Markets
Record when favored vs. an underdog, across the 11priced bouts in each fighter’s history.
Career splits
13 bouts · vs Ramirez

- KO/TKO2
- Submission4
- Decision2
- KO/TKO3
- Submission0
- Decision2
- Average8:49
- vs Orthodox5-2
- vs Southpaw3-2
- vs Switch0-1
- vs Longer reach0-1
- vs Shorter reach6-4
2 bouts · vs Hooper

- KO/TKO—
- Submission—
- Decision—
- KO/TKO2
- Submission0
- Decision0
- Average9:42
- vs Orthodox0-2
- vs Southpawno data
- vs Switchno data
- vs Longer reachno data
- vs Shorter reachno data
Tale of the Tape
The biometric and experience deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.


When their fights end
every UFC finish on the fight clockFull method breakdown
| Outcome | Chase Hooper | Mitch Ramirez |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 225% | 0 |
| by submission | 450% | 0 |
| by decision | 225% | 0 |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 360% | 2100% |
| by submission | 00% | 00% |
| by decision | 240% | 00% |
| Pace | ||
| Avg finish time (own wins) | R2 2:32 | — |
| Finishes used in avg | 6 | 0 |
Counts come from the same denormalised win/loss-by-method columns the rest of the site uses. The percentile context on each row is computed against fighters currently assigned to this weight class with at least two resolved UFC bouts.
KO history
Knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head — then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last KO/TKO scoredvs Felipe Colares4 years agoUFC Fight Night: Holm vs. Vieira · May 21, 2022 · R3 · 3:00
- Last time KO'dvs Lance Gibson Jr.2 months agoUFC Fight Night: Adesanya vs. Pyfer · Mar 28, 2026 · R1 · 2:56
- Last submission scoredvs Clay Guida1y 5mo agoUFC 310: Pantoja vs. Asakura · Dec 7, 2024 · R1 · 3:41
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
- Last KO/TKO scoredNo KO/TKO wins in the UFC yet
- Last time KO'dvs Mike Davis10 months agoUFC Fight Night: Lewis vs. Teixeira · Jul 12, 2025 · R2 · 4:08
- Last submission scoredNo submission wins in the UFC yet
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
Common opponents
UFC opponents both fighters have faced — a direct read on relative quality controlling for matchmaking.
These two fighters haven’t crossed paths in the UFC cage with any of the same opponents.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Chase Hooper | Mitch Ramirez |
|---|---|---|
| Top-15 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
| Cross-div ranked | 1-1 | — |
| Building | 3-1 | 0-1 |
| Unproven | 3-2 | — |
- L vs Lance Gibson Jr.8Mar 28, 2026 · Unproven
- L vs Alexander Hernandez#1560Aug 16, 2025 · Top-15
- W vs Jim Miller#1462Apr 12, 2025 · Top-15
- W vs Clay Guida45Dec 7, 2024 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Viacheslav Borshchev18May 11, 2024 · Building
- W vs Jordan Leavitt18Nov 18, 2023 · Building
- W vs Nick Fiore8May 20, 2023 · Unproven
- L vs Steve Garcia8Oct 29, 2022 · Unproven
- W vs Felipe Colares18May 21, 2022 · Building
- L vs Steven Peterson18Jun 12, 2021 · Building
- W vs Peter Barrett8Dec 12, 2020 · Unproven
- L vs Alex Caceres45Jun 6, 2020 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Daniel Teymur8Dec 14, 2019 · Unproven
Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with quality wins (35%) and is Bayesian-shrunken toward the UFC median for small samples. Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, and falls back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Recent form
Last five UFC bouts, current trajectory, and the level of opposition faced going into this matchup.




Striking matchup
Where each fighter lands their strikes — and where each one gets hit — across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.


Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Chase Hooper | 46.4top 14% of division | 41% | 33.4around division average | 355 |
| Head | Mitch Ramirez | 24.0below division average | 26% | 30.2above division average | 31 |
| Body | Chase Hooper | 12.2above division average | 74% | 6.67top 24% of division | 93 |
| Body | Mitch Ramirez | 10.1around division average | 76% | 13.9well below average | 13 |
| Leg | Chase Hooper | 7.06around division average | 83% | 6.54above division average | 54 |
| Leg | Mitch Ramirez | 17.8top 9% of division | 92% | 11.6well below average | 23 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Wrestling output, ground threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.


Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Chase Hooper | Mitch Ramirez | Career totals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 21 / 0 |
| Takedown accuracy | 34% | 0% | 21/62 · 0/2 |
| Takedown defense | 50% | 25% | stopped 9/18 · 1/4 |
| Submission attempts / 15 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 15 / 0 |
| Control time / 15 (min) | 5.3 min | 0.3 min | 40:13 · 0:26 |
| Time controlled BY opponent / 15 (min) | 3.2 min | 8.5 min | 24:19 · 10:58 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time.
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
Hooper holds 88% of round-1 work rate by round 3. Ramirez hasn't reached the third round in enough UFC bouts to read a fade pattern yet.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Chase Hooper | 7.5 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 0.56 | 33% | 13 |
| R1 | Mitch Ramirez | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.10 | 0% | 2 |
| R2 | Chase Hooper | 7.6 | 4.4 | 2.6 | 0.61 | 35% | 7 |
| R2 | Mitch Ramirez | 6.3 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 0.11 | 5% | 2 |
| R3 | Chase Hooper | 6.9 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 0.42 | 40% | 6 |
| R3 | Mitch Ramirez | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24.0 | 0.00 | 0% | 1 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace. See Methods for the full formula.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
- Mitch has 8 months more layoff
