Compare Azamat Murzakanov vs Jan Blachowicz — UFC matchup breakdown
Tale of the Tape
The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
- Jan has 4 months more layoff
- Azamat is speeding up while opponent slows
Division percentiles below rank both fighters against the Light Heavyweight roster (264 fighters).
Recent form
Last five pro bouts (non-UFC fights dashed + tagged), current trajectory, and the level of opposition going into this matchup.
Common opponents
Every UFC opponent both fighters have faced — a direct comparison controlling for matchmaking.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Azamat Murzakanov | Jan Blachowicz |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | — | 0-3-1 |
| Top-5 | 1-0 | 6-4 |
| Top-15 | 2-1 | 1-1-1 |
| Cross-div champ | — | 2-0 |
| Cross-div ranked | — | 1-0 |
| Building | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| Unproven | 2-0 | 1-0 |
- L vs Paulo Costa63Apr 11, 2026 · Top-15
- W vs Aleksandar Rakic#782Oct 25, 2025 · Top-5
- W vs Brendson Ribeiro12Jun 7, 2025 · Unproven
- W vs Alonzo Menifield#1366Aug 3, 2024 · Top-15
- W vs Dustin Jacoby#1363Apr 15, 2023 · Top-15
- W vs Devin Clark22Aug 13, 2022 · Building
- W vs Tafon Nchukwi12Mar 12, 2022 · Unproven
- D vs Bogdan Guskov#1170Dec 6, 2025 · Top-15
- L vs Carlos Ulberg#691Mar 22, 2025 · Champion
- L vs Alex Pereira81Jul 29, 2023 · Champion
- D vs Magomed Ankalaev#394Dec 10, 2022 · Champion
- W vs Aleksandar Rakic#386May 14, 2022 · Top-5
- L vs Glover Teixeira#197Oct 30, 2021 · Champion
- W vs Israel Adesanya78Mar 6, 2021 · Cross-div champ
- W vs Dominick Reyes#190Sep 26, 2020 · Top-5
- W vs Corey Anderson#580Feb 15, 2020 · Top-5
- W vs Jacare Souza45Nov 16, 2019 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Luke Rockhold67Jul 6, 2019 · Cross-div champ
- L vs Thiago Santos#685Feb 23, 2019 · Top-5
- W vs Nikita Krylov#876Sep 15, 2018 · Top-5
- W vs Jimi Manuwa#485Mar 17, 2018 · Top-5
- W vs Jared Cannonier#1462Dec 16, 2017 · Top-15
- W vs Devin Clark18Oct 21, 2017 · Building
- L vs Patrick Cummins#1268Apr 8, 2017 · Top-15
- L vs Alexander Gustafsson#289Sep 3, 2016 · Top-5
- W vs Igor Pokrajac8Apr 10, 2016 · Unproven
- L vs Corey Anderson59Sep 5, 2015 · Top-5
- L vs Jimi Manuwa#981Apr 11, 2015 · Top-5
- W vs Ilir Latifi61Oct 4, 2014 · Top-5
All figures are 0–100 ratings (shown as %), not percentages of anything literal. Schedule strength = the average quality of every UFC opponent faced (win or lose). Win quality = the average quality of the opponents actually beaten. The composite Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with win quality (35%). Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, falling back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. For fighters with limited UFC experience the headline is held toward a rookie baseline, so debut / low-sample fighters read lower than established names. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Career splits
Striking matchup
Each fighter's offense mapped against the other's defense — where one attacks meets where the other gets hit, across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.
Murzakanov has the striking edge (+17).
Where Murzakanov attacks (green = high volume) vs where Blachowicz gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Murzakanov’s green zones meeting Blachowicz’s red zones are the openings.
- Head71%74th201
- Body25%77th71
- Leg4%35th11
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes
- Head59%62nd541
- Body17%61st153
- Leg24%30th224
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent
- Standing69%196
- Clinch6%18
- Ground24%69
- Standing67%613
- Clinch9%80
- Ground25%225
Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.
Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Azamat Murzakanov | top 26% of division41.1 | 50% | above division average28.7 | 201 |
| Head | Jan Blachowicz | above division average32.7 | 42% | above division average28.9 | 638 |
| Body | Azamat Murzakanov | top 23% of division14.0 | 81% | below division average11.3 | 71 |
| Body | Jan Blachowicz | above division average10.8 | 67% | above division average8.2 | 213 |
| Leg | Azamat Murzakanov | below division average5.0 | 92% | well below average11.9 | 11 |
| Leg | Jan Blachowicz | above division average9.4 | 84% | below division average11.1 | 186 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Takedowns, submission threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.
Each metric graded on the division — the bar leans toward whoever wins that part of the grappling exchange (longer + greener = a bigger edge).
Evenly matched grappling — no clear edge either way.
Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Azamat Murzakanov | Jan Blachowicz |
|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns | 0.73 | 1.019 |
| Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted | 21%3 / 14 | 49%19 / 39 |
| Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced | 89%8 / 9 | 69%41 / 59 |
| Submission attempts / 15career attempts | 0.21 | 0.47 |
| Control time / 15 (min)career total | 1.5 min6:08 | 2.0 min39:08 |
| Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total | 1.6 min6:33 | 4.0 min78:07 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time. Accuracy under 8 career attempts is shown raw and ungraded — too small a sample to rate against the division.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.
When their fights end
every pro finish on the fight clockFinish & durability rates
Full professional career
Full method breakdown
| Outcome | Azamat Murzakanov | Jan Blachowicz |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 12(75%) | 9(31%) |
| by submission | 1(6%) | 9(31%) |
| by decision | 3(19%) | 11(38%) |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 1(100%) | 2(18%) |
| by submission | 0(0%) | 2(18%) |
| by decision | 0(0%) | 7(64%) |
Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.
KO history
UFC fights only — knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head, then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last time KO'dvs Paulo Costa2 months agoUFC 327: Prochazka vs. Ulberg · Apr 11, 2026 · R3 · 1:23
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
- Last time KO'dvs Thiago Santos7y 3mo agoUFC Fight Night: Blachowicz vs. Santos · Feb 23, 2019 · R3 · 0:39
- Last time submittedvs Glover Teixeira4y 7mo agoUFC 267: Blachowicz vs. Teixeira · Oct 30, 2021 · R2 · 3:02
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
Both lean the same way, but Murzakanov leans harder: Murzakanov builds (+30% per round through round 3), Blachowicz builds (+12% per round through round 3). Within fights that reached round 3, Murzakanov lifts to 223% of round-1 output by round 3, Blachowicz 119%.
Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Azamat Murzakanov | 4.0 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 0.13 | 7% | 7 |
| R1 | Jan Blachowicz | 4.1 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 0.08 | 13% | 22 |
| R2 | Azamat Murzakanov | 6.8 | 5.4 | 3.3 | 0.30 | 14% | 5 |
| R2 | Jan Blachowicz | 4.7 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.18 | 12% | 20 |
| R3 | Azamat Murzakanov | 7.7 | 6.4 | 5.1 | 0.36 | 5% | 4 |
| R3 | Jan Blachowicz | 5.2 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 0.18 | 13% | 15 |
| R4 | Azamat Murzakanov | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| R4 | Jan Blachowicz | 3.5 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.13 | 23% | 3 |
| R5 | Azamat Murzakanov | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| R5 | Jan Blachowicz | 3.7 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 0.07 | 17% | 3 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.