Compare Denise Gomes vs Jessica Andrade — UFC matchup breakdown
Tale of the Tape
The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
Shared training affiliations
Camps both fighters currently affiliate with. The strongest signal first; secondary ties follow.
Division percentiles below rank both fighters against the Women's Strawweight roster (41 fighters).
Recent form
Last five pro bouts (non-UFC fights dashed + tagged), current trajectory, and the level of opposition going into this matchup.
Common opponents
Every UFC opponent both fighters have faced — a direct comparison controlling for matchmaking.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Denise Gomes | Jessica Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | — | 3-5 |
| Top-5 | 1-0 | 8-6 |
| Top-15 | 1-2 | 4-2 |
| Cross-div ranked | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| Building | 2-0 | — |
| Unproven | 1-0 | 1-0 |
- W vs Tecia Pennington#1363Nov 8, 2025 · Top-15
- W vs Elise Reed18May 17, 2025 · Building
- W vs Karolina Kowalkiewicz#1578Nov 9, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Eduarda Moura32Jun 8, 2024 · Cross-div ranked
- L vs Angela Hill#1268Nov 4, 2023 · Top-15
- W vs Yazmin Jauregui15Jul 8, 2023 · Building
- W vs Bruna Brasil8Apr 15, 2023 · Unproven
- L vs Loma Lookboonmee46Sep 17, 2022 · Top-15
- L vs Loopy Godinez#1172Aug 16, 2025 · Top-15
- L vs Jasmine Jasudavicius#975May 10, 2025 · Top-5
- L vs Natalia Silva#887Sep 7, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Marina Rodriguez#684Apr 13, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Mackenzie Dern#791Nov 11, 2023 · Champion
- L vs Tatiana Suarez#1086Aug 5, 2023 · Top-5
- L vs Yan Xiaonan#688May 6, 2023 · Top-5
- L vs Erin Blanchfield#1084Feb 18, 2023 · Top-5
- W vs Lauren Murphy#485Jan 21, 2023 · Top-5
- W vs Amanda Lemos#1082Apr 23, 2022 · Top-5
- W vs Cynthia Calvillo#587Sep 25, 2021 · Top-5
- L vs Valentina ShevchenkoCHAMP100Apr 24, 2021 · Champion
- W vs Katlyn Cerminara63Oct 17, 2020 · Top-5
- L vs Rose Namajunas#297Jul 11, 2020 · Champion
- L vs Zhang Weili83Aug 31, 2019 · Champion
- W vs Rose NamajunasCHAMP100May 11, 2019 · Champion
- W vs Karolina Kowalkiewicz#485Sep 8, 2018 · Top-5
- W vs Tecia Pennington52Feb 24, 2018 · Top-15
- W vs Claudia Gadelha#190Sep 22, 2017 · Top-5
- L vs Joanna JedrzejczykCHAMP100May 13, 2017 · Champion
- W vs Angela Hill#1567Feb 4, 2017 · Top-15
- W vs Joanne Wood36Sep 10, 2016 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Jessica Penne#681Jun 4, 2016 · Top-5
- L vs Raquel Pennington#1586Sep 5, 2015 · Champion
- W vs Sarah Moras44Jul 15, 2015 · Top-15
- L vs Marion Reneau52Feb 22, 2015 · Top-15
- W vs Larissa Pacheco8Sep 13, 2014 · Unproven
- W vs Raquel Pennington#1387Mar 15, 2014 · Champion
- W vs Rosi Sexton#1068Oct 26, 2013 · Top-15
- L vs Liz Carmouche#582Jul 27, 2013 · Top-5
All figures are 0–100 ratings (shown as %), not percentages of anything literal. Schedule strength = the average quality of every UFC opponent faced (win or lose). Win quality = the average quality of the opponents actually beaten. The composite Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with win quality (35%). Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, falling back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. For fighters with limited UFC experience the headline is held toward a rookie baseline, so debut / low-sample fighters read lower than established names. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Career splits
Striking matchup
Each fighter's offense mapped against the other's defense — where one attacks meets where the other gets hit, across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.
Evenly matched striking — no clear edge either way.
Where Gomes attacks (green = high volume) vs where Andrade gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Gomes’s green zones meeting Andrade’s red zones are the openings.
- Head49%39th173
- Body31%75th110
- Leg21%67th73
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes
- Head69%14th1,094
- Body18%40th287
- Leg14%33rd216
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent
- Standing60%215
- Clinch26%91
- Ground14%50
- Standing79%1,260
- Clinch15%241
- Ground6%96
Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.
Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Denise Gomes | below division average31.3 | 39% | top 21% of division26.6 | 173 |
| Head | Jessica Andrade | top 6% of division56.7 | 40% | bottom of the division54.7 | 1,147 |
| Body | Denise Gomes | top 25% of division16.9 | 71% | below division average14.9 | 110 |
| Body | Jessica Andrade | top 14% of division20.2 | 71% | below division average14.9 | 406 |
| Leg | Denise Gomes | above division average11.2 | 75% | around division average9.8 | 73 |
| Leg | Jessica Andrade | top 16% of division13.5 | 86% | below division average11.0 | 271 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Takedowns, submission threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.
Each metric graded on the division — the bar leans toward whoever wins that part of the grappling exchange (longer + greener = a bigger edge).
Evenly matched grappling — no clear edge either way.
Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Denise Gomes | Jessica Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns | 1.710 | 2.140 |
| Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted | 34%10 / 29 | 54%40 / 74 |
| Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced | 66%29 / 44 | 75%69 / 92 |
| Submission attempts / 15career attempts | 0.85 | 0.36 |
| Control time / 15 (min)career total | 4.5 min26:49 | 3.4 min64:34 |
| Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total | 4.2 min24:33 | 1.5 min27:52 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time. Accuracy under 8 career attempts is shown raw and ungraded — too small a sample to rate against the division.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.
When their fights end
every pro finish on the fight clockFinish & durability rates
Full professional career
Full method breakdown
| Outcome | Denise Gomes | Jessica Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 7(58%) | 10(38%) |
| by submission | 0(0%) | 8(31%) |
| by decision | 5(42%) | 8(31%) |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 1(33%) | 5(33%) |
| by submission | 0(0%) | 5(33%) |
| by decision | 2(67%) | 5(33%) |
Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.
KO history
UFC fights only — knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head, then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last time KO'dNever finished by strikes in the UFC
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
- Last time KO'dvs Yan Xiaonan3y 1mo agoUFC 288: Sterling vs. Cejudo · May 6, 2023 · R1 · 2:20
- Last time submittedvs Jasmine Jasudavicius1y 1mo agoUFC 315: Muhammad vs. Della Maddalena · May 10, 2025 · R1 · 2:40
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
Cardio edge to Andrade: Andrade builds (+21% per round through round 3) while Gomes fades (-15% per round through round 3). Within fights that reached round 3, Gomes drops to 83% of round-1 output by round 3, Andrade 151%.
Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Denise Gomes | 6.4 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 0.40 | 34% | 8 |
| R1 | Jessica Andrade | 7.0 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 0.25 | 24% | 30 |
| R2 | Denise Gomes | 7.5 | 5.2 | 3.7 | 0.43 | 25% | 7 |
| R2 | Jessica Andrade | 8.3 | 6.8 | 5.8 | 0.26 | 19% | 20 |
| R3 | Denise Gomes | 4.5 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 0.12 | 31% | 5 |
| R3 | Jessica Andrade | 10.7 | 8.7 | 6.0 | 0.30 | 27% | 12 |
| R4 | Denise Gomes | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| R4 | Jessica Andrade | 3.5 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 0.20 | 21% | 1 |
| R5 | Denise Gomes | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| R5 | Jessica Andrade | 5.3 | 5.2 | 8.6 | 0.00 | 3% | 1 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.