Compare Amanda Ribas vs Tatiana Suarez — UFC matchup breakdown
Tale of the Tape
The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
- Amanda has 8 months more layoff
Division percentiles below rank both fighters against the Women's Strawweight roster (41 fighters). Amanda Ribas fights at Women's Strawweight; Tatiana Suarez at Strawweight — Tatiana Suarez’s percentiles are measured against a division they don’t compete in, so read them with that in mind.
Recent form
Last five pro bouts (non-UFC fights dashed + tagged), current trajectory, and the level of opposition going into this matchup.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Amanda Ribas | Tatiana Suarez |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | 1-1 | 2-1 |
| Top-5 | 2-4 | 2-0 |
| Top-15 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
| Cross-div ranked | 1-0 | — |
| Title-fight challenger | — | 1-0 |
| Building | — | 1-0 |
- L vs Tabatha Ricci#1072Jul 26, 2025 · Top-15
- L vs Mackenzie Dern#691Jan 11, 2025 · Champion
- L vs Rose Namajunas72Mar 23, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Luana Pinheiro#970Nov 18, 2023 · Top-15
- L vs Maycee Barber#1176Jun 24, 2023 · Top-5
- W vs Viviane Araujo#876Mar 4, 2023 · Top-5
- L vs Katlyn Cerminara68May 14, 2022 · Top-5
- W vs Virna Jandiroba#1285Oct 30, 2021 · Top-5
- L vs Marina Rodriguez#883Jan 23, 2021 · Top-5
- W vs Paige VanZant#1464Jul 11, 2020 · Top-15
- W vs Randa Markos#1470Mar 14, 2020 · Top-15
- W vs Mackenzie Dern#1586Oct 12, 2019 · Champion
- W vs Emily Whitmire45Jun 29, 2019 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Loopy Godinez#675Apr 11, 2026 · Top-15
- W vs Amanda Lemos#486Sep 13, 2025 · Top-5
- L vs Zhang WeiliCHAMP100Feb 8, 2025 · Champion
- W vs Jessica Andrade#594Aug 5, 2023 · Champion
- W vs Montana De La Rosa#1572Feb 25, 2023 · Top-5
- W vs Nina Nunes55Jun 8, 2019 · Top-15
- W vs Carla Esparza#691Sep 8, 2018 · Champion
- W vs Alexa Grasso#975May 19, 2018 · Top-15
- W vs Viviane Pereira15Nov 11, 2017 · Building
- W vs Amanda Cooper50Jul 8, 2016 · Title-fight challenger
All figures are 0–100 ratings (shown as %), not percentages of anything literal. Schedule strength = the average quality of every UFC opponent faced (win or lose). Win quality = the average quality of the opponents actually beaten. The composite Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with win quality (35%). Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, falling back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. For fighters with limited UFC experience the headline is held toward a rookie baseline, so debut / low-sample fighters read lower than established names. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Career splits
Striking matchup
Each fighter's offense mapped against the other's defense — where one attacks meets where the other gets hit, across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.
Evenly matched striking — no clear edge either way.
Where Ribas attacks (green = high volume) vs where Suarez gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Ribas’s green zones meeting Suarez’s red zones are the openings.
- Head61%63rd421
- Body18%40th123
- Leg21%77th142
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes
- Head61%91st113
- Body28%81st51
- Leg11%86th20
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent
- Standing86%589
- Clinch5%36
- Ground9%61
- Standing55%101
- Clinch24%44
- Ground21%39
Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.
Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Amanda Ribas | above division average38.3 | 32% | around division average35.2 | 421 |
| Head | Tatiana Suarez | well below average25.5 | 50% | top 9% of division21.6 | 163 |
| Body | Amanda Ribas | below division average11.9 | 55% | above division average11.0 | 123 |
| Body | Tatiana Suarez | around division average13.0 | 72% | top 19% of division8.9 | 97 |
| Leg | Amanda Ribas | top 23% of division12.3 | 79% | top 27% of division5.9 | 142 |
| Leg | Tatiana Suarez | around division average8.6 | 83% | top 14% of division4.6 | 63 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Takedowns, submission threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.
Each metric graded on the division — the bar leans toward whoever wins that part of the grappling exchange (longer + greener = a bigger edge).
Suarez has the grappling edge (+9).
Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Amanda Ribas | Tatiana Suarez |
|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns | 2.122 | 4.534 |
| Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted | 52%22 / 42 | 46%34 / 74 |
| Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced | 82%28 / 34 | 57%4 / 7 |
| Submission attempts / 15career attempts | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| Control time / 15 (min)career total | 4.0 min43:00 | 8.9 min67:14 |
| Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total | 2.3 min24:44 | 1.8 min13:21 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time. Accuracy under 8 career attempts is shown raw and ungraded — too small a sample to rate against the division.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.
When their fights end
every pro finish on the fight clockFinish & durability rates
Full professional career
Full method breakdown
| Outcome | Amanda Ribas | Tatiana Suarez |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 3(25%) | 2(17%) |
| by submission | 4(33%) | 6(50%) |
| by decision | 5(42%) | 4(33%) |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 4(57%) | 0(0%) |
| by submission | 1(14%) | 0(0%) |
| by decision | 2(29%) | 1(100%) |
Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.
KO history
UFC fights only — knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head, then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last time KO'dvs Tabatha Ricci10 months agoUFC Fight Night: Whittaker vs. De Ridder · Jul 26, 2025 · R2 · 2:59
- Last time submittedvs Mackenzie Dern1y 5mo agoUFC Fight Night: Dern vs. Ribas 2 · Jan 11, 2025 · R3 · 4:56
- Last time KO'dNever finished by strikes in the UFC
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
Both lean the same way, but Ribas leans harder: Ribas builds (+26% per round through round 3), Suarez builds (+5% per round through round 3). Within fights that reached round 3, Ribas lifts to 178% of round-1 output by round 3, Suarez 101%.
Faded points are drawn from a single bout that reached that round, so they’re less reliable than the solid points averaged over many fights.
Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Amanda Ribas | 5.1 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 0.29 | 31% | 13 |
| R1 | Tatiana Suarez | 7.5 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.60 | 73% | 10 |
| R2 | Amanda Ribas | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 0.26 | 31% | 12 |
| R2 | Tatiana Suarez | 7.6 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.75 | 66% | 8 |
| R3 | Amanda Ribas | 8.5 | 6.8 | 3.2 | 0.28 | 22% | 8 |
| R3 | Tatiana Suarez | 8.2 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 0.69 | 49% | 5 |
| R4 | Amanda Ribas | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.00 | 0% | 1 |
| R4 | Tatiana Suarez | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.00 | 0% | 1 |
| R5 | Amanda Ribas | 4.8 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 0.00 | 0% | 1 |
| R5 | Tatiana Suarez | 3.7 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 1.00 | 12% | 1 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.