Mateusz Gamrot vs Quillan Salkilld Stats & Odds

Matchup read

Where each fighter holds an edge — offense against the opponent's defense.

Mateusz Gamrot

edge

Quillan Salkilld

Striking

Even

Even striking exchange

Effective offense

B

69th

1.6

+24

A+

93rd

2.9

Defense

A

72nd

60%

+31

D

41st

45%

KO power

D

8 KO

0.1 KD

+20

C

5 KO

0.6 KD

See full Striking →

Wrestling

◂ Gamrot

Gamrot has the bigger wrestling edge on Salkilld

Takedowns landed

A+

96th

5.2

Even

A+

98th

6.2

Takedown accuracy

C

55th

39%

+16

D

39th

31%

Takedown defense

A

77th

83%

+12

B

65th

75%

Control time

A

82nd

4.9 min

Even

A+

85th

5.3 min

See full Grappling →

Submission

Even

Both real submission threats

Submission attempts

C

42nd

0.2

+20

B

63rd

0.6

Sub win rate

B

70th

23%

6 subs

Even

A

74th

33%

4 subs

Submission defense

C

50th

3%

Even

C

44th

8%

See full Grappling →

Finishing

Even

Both finishing threats

Finish rate

B

61st

56%

Even

B

68th

80%

KO durability

B

63rd

0%

Even

B

59th

0%

Submission defense

C

44th

8%

Even

C

49th

0%

See full Finishes →

Pace

Salkilld ▸

Salkilld pushes the higher work rate over five rounds

Work rate / min — full fight

7.4

9.6

Work rate / min — rounds 1–2

6.6

9.6

Pace trend+19%/rd—

See full Pace →

Form

Salkilld ▸

Salkilld is in better recent form than Gamrot

Win rate (career)

69%

100%

After a win

63%

100%

Last 5

60%

100%

Win streakW1W5

See full Form →

Schedule

◂ Gamrot

Gamrot has faced the tougher schedule vs Salkilld

Schedule strength

61%

36%

Win quality

65%

84%

Ranked opponents

8

1

Title-holder bouts

0

Even

0

Common opp (1)0-11-0

See full Schedule →

Activity

Salkilld ▸

Salkilld has fought more often lately than Gamrot

Last bout

3mo

2mo

Bouts, last 12 mo

2

3

Bouts, last 24 mo

4

6

See full Activity →

Tale of the tape

Salkilld ▸

Salkilld 5" reach · Salkilld 5 cm · Salkilld 9y younger · Open-stance matchup

Mateusz GamrotvsQuillan Salkilld

35

Age

9y

younger

26

5'10"

178cm

Height

2"

taller

6'0"

183cm

71"

179cm

Reach

5"

reach

75"

191cm

Edge sizeSlightNotableMajor

See full Tale of the tape →

Core metrics

Each fighter's career rates as a division percentile.

Mateusz GamrotQuillan Salkilld

Percentile

Striking/min3.215.01

Accuracy%51%57%

Defense%60%45%

Takedowns/155.27.3

TD defense%83%80%

Submissions/150.20.8

Career rate as a percentile within the lightweight (421 fighters) — further right is better. Descriptive research, not a prediction.

Markets

UFC betting history

Career

GamrotMateusz Gamrot

SalkilldQuillan Salkilld

0-10%

As pick'em

—

Notes

UFC betting history is each fighter’s record when favored vs. an underdog, across their priced UFC bouts. Pick’em = closing consensus within ~2 points of even — too close to call a true favorite.

Career splits

GamrotMateusz Gamrot

Stat

SalkilldQuillan Salkilld

3

0

KO / TKO

3

—

2

1

Submission

1

—

4

3

Decision

1

—

11:56

Avg fight time

4:52

Mateusz Gamrot’s splits

vs Salkilld

vs Southpaw

3-175%

vs Switch

1-150%

vs Shorter reach

3-0100%

Highlighted row matches this opponent’s profile — tap it to see who it counts.

Quillan Salkilld’s splits

vs Gamrot

vs Orthodox

2-0100%

vs Switch

1-0100%

vs Longer reach

0-0no data

Highlighted row matches this opponent’s profile — tap it to see who it counts.

Tale of the Tape

The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.

Mateusz GamrotvsQuillan Salkilld

35

Age

9y

younger

26

5'10"

178cm

Height

2"

taller

6'0"

183cm

71"

179cm

Reach

5"

reach

75"

191cm

Edge sizeSlightNotableMajor

Striking matchup

Each fighter's offense against the other's defense, per 15 minutes.

UFC only

Overall Striking

Striking

B

58th

Even

B

62nd

Evenly matched striking — no clear edge either way.

Attacking

Gamrot’s offensevsSalkilld’s defense

Where Gamrot attacks (green = high volume) vs where Salkilld gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Gamrot’s green zones meeting Salkilld’s red zones are the openings.

Mateusz GamrotOffense

Head77%70th382
Body14%39th68
Leg10%39th48

Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes

Quillan SalkilldDefense

Head75%52nd41
Body16%57th9
Leg9%59th5

Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent

Gamrot — by position

75%Standing

Standing75%375
Clinch6%32
Ground18%91

Salkilld — absorbed by position

62%Standing

Standing62%34
Clinch29%16
Ground9%5

Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.

Gamrot’s offensevsSalkilld’s defense

Head

B

70th

35.4

+18

C

52nd

30.3

Body

D

39th

7.4

+17

C

57th

8.8

Leg

D

39th

5.4

+20

B

59th

6.5

Salkilld’s offensevsGamrot’s defense

Head

B

70th

35.5

Even

B

67th

24.0

Body

B

69th

12.6

+44

F

24th

13.7

Leg

B

59th

8.2

Even

C

58th

6.6

Full breakdown — all zones, both views

Zone	Fighter	Landed / 15	Accuracy	Absorbed / 15	Career landed
Head	Mateusz Gamrot	top 30% of division35.4	46%	above division average24.0	382
Head	Quillan Salkilld	top 30% of division35.5	51%	around division average30.3	74
Body	Mateusz Gamrot	below division average7.4	73%	well below average13.7	68
Body	Quillan Salkilld	above division average12.6	85%	above division average8.8	28
Leg	Mateusz Gamrot	below division average5.4	94%	above division average6.6	48
Leg	Quillan Salkilld	above division average8.2	88%	above division average6.5	14

Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.

Grappling matchup

Takedowns, submission threat, and control, per 15 minutes.

UFC only

Mateusz Gamrot

Quillan Salkilld

Overall Grappling

Grappling

A

70th

Even

B

65th

Evenly matched grappling — no clear edge either way.

Takedowns

A+

94th

5.2

Even

A+

88th

6.2

Takedown accuracy

C

55th

39%

54/140

+16

D

39th

31%

10/32

Takedown defense

A

77th

83%

10/12

+12

B

65th

75%

9/12

Submission threat

C

46th

0.2

+19

B

65th

0.6

Control time

A

79th

4.9 min

+10

B

69th

5.3 min

Full breakdown — career grappling totals

Metric	Mateusz Gamrot	Quillan Salkilld
Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns	5.254	6.210
Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted	39%54 / 140	31%10 / 32
Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced	83%10 / 12	75%9 / 12
Submission attempts / 15career attempts	0.22	0.61
Control time / 15 (min)career total	4.9 min50:10	5.3 min8:35
Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total	0.8 min8:26	3.6 min5:54

UFCStats career rates, per 15 minutes. Takedown defense = stops ÷ attempts. Under 8 attempts shown ungraded.

Common opponents

The single UFC opponent both fighters have faced. Reads as a directional signal, not a verdict.

Mateusz Gamrot

Quillan Salkilld

Record vs common opponents

Edge · Salkilld

0-1

0-1

1-0

1-0

Edge · Salkilld

Decision (Unanimous)R3· 5:00

Schedule Score

Opponent quality, ranked against every UFC fighter (≥3 bouts).

UFC only

Mateusz Gamrot

65

Schedule Score

Quillan Salkilld

47

Schedule Score

UFC experienceTotal octagon time + bouts

155 min

13 bouts

Octagon time

131 min

more

24 min

5 bouts

Schedule strength

61%

36%

Win quality

65%

84%

Ranked opponents

8

1

Title-holder bouts

0

Even

0

Pre-UFC opposition

non-UFC slate for Quillan Salkilld, from opponents’ full pro records

Quillan Salkilld

Strong

Opponents' combined record

38-26

.594 win rate

Winning-record opponents

5 of 7

carried winning pro records

Pro bouts faced

7

all opponents have records on file

A descriptive read of the non-UFC slate from opponents’ full career pro records — not a UFC-grade Schedule Score.

Per-tier records + bout-by-bout

Per-tier records

Tier	Mateusz Gamrot	Quillan Salkilld
Champion	1-1	—
Top-5	1-2	1-0
Top-15	3-0	—
Cross-div ranked	1-0	—
Contender-level	1-0	1-0
Established	1-0	—
Building	1-1	2-0
Unproven	—	1-0

Mateusz Gamrot — bouts

Quillan Salkilld — bouts

0–100 ratings. Schedule strength = average opponent quality faced; Win quality = quality of opponents beaten. Composite = 65% schedule + 35% wins, scored on rank-at-time-of-fight.

Recent form

Last five pro bouts and recent opposition.

Mateusz Gamrot

Quillan Salkilld

Gamrot — last 5

recent → old

Salkilld — last 5

recent → old

Last 5 record

3-2

5-0

Current streak

W1

W5

Ranked opps

3 of 5

1 of 5

Layoff

3 mo

2 mo

Career cohorts

Each fighter’s record by situation, over every completed UFC bout. Read down a fighter’s column; bold marks the better win rate (3+ bouts).

Mateusz Gamrot

Quillan Salkilld

Post-result bounce

SituationGamrot Salkilld

After a loss

4-0100%

—

After a win

5-363%

4-0100%

Camp length

SituationGamrot Salkilld

Short turnaround< 100 days

1-0100%

2-0100%

Typical camp100–180 days

4-357%

2-0100%

Long layoff> 180 days

4-0100%

—

Finishing & durability

How fights end for each — finish rate and durability.

Mateusz Gamrot

Quillan Salkilld

When their fights end

every pro finish on the fight clock

Gamrot14W–1L by finish

R1

R2

R3

R4

Salkilld9W–1L by finish · 78% in round 1

R1

R2

R3

R4

0:00

5:00

10:00

15:00

20:00

Win(above)Loss(below)KO / TKOSubmissionPosition = when the fight ended

Finish & durability rates

Full professional career

Finish rate

↑21%·Salkilld

percent of wins ending by KO or submission

↑21%·Salkilld

F

19th

54%

+31

C

50th

75%

Goes the distance

Even

percent of resolved bouts going to a decision (style read, not quality)

Even

50%

23%

KO durability

Even

percent of resolved bouts ending in a KO/TKO loss

Even

A

78th

0%

Even

A

78th

0%

Submission defense

↑5%·Gamrot

percent of resolved bouts ending by submission loss

↑5%·Gamrot

B

59th

3%

+20

D

39th

8%

Full method breakdown

Outcome	Mateusz Gamrot	Quillan Salkilld
Wins
by KO / TKO	8(31%)	5(42%)
by submission	6(23%)	4(33%)
by decision	12(46%)	3(25%)
Losses
by KO / TKO	0(0%)	0(0%)
by submission	1(25%)	1(100%)
by decision	3(75%)	0(0%)

Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.

KO history

Knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head (UFC).

Mateusz Gamrot

vs

Quillan Salkilld

23%

3 KO/TKO in 13 bouts

Knockout rate

50%

3 KO/TKO in 6 bouts

1

0.3 / 100 head

Knockdowns dealt

3

4.1 / 100 head

0

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

Clean KO losses

0

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

5

2.3 / 100 head

Knockdowns absorbed

0

0.0 / 100 head

Chin bars use a league scale: green = clean record, red = bottom ~10% of UFC fighters (4+ KO losses · 6+ knockdowns absorbed).

Mateusz GamrotFinish timeline

Last time KO'd
Never finished by strikes in the UFC
Last time submitted
vs Charles Oliveira8 months ago
UFC Fight Night: Oliveira vs. Gamrot · Oct 11, 2025 · R2 · 2:48

Quillan SalkilldFinish timeline

Last time KO'd
Never finished by strikes in the UFC
Last time submitted
Never submitted in the UFC

Pace & fade

Round-by-round work rate, and whether they fade.

UFC only

Mateusz Gamrot

132%

R3 vs R1 · 7 bouts reaching R3

Quillan Salkilld

—

< 2 bouts to R3

Gamrot lifts to 132% of round-1 output by round 3 (within fights reaching round 3). Salkilld hasn't reached the third round in enough UFC bouts to read a pace pattern yet.

Gamrot ▲ BUILDS

SalkilldOutput / min

Faded points are drawn from a single bout that reached that round, so they’re less reliable than the solid points averaged over many fights.

Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.

Full per-round breakdown — both fighters

What drives the pace · per round

The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.

Sig. strikes landed

Gamrot

Salkilldlanded / min

Takedown attempts

Gamrot

Salkilldattempts / min

Control time

Gamrot

Salkilld% of round

Round	Fighter	Output / min	Sig landed / min	Sig absorbed / min	TD att / min	Control	Bouts
R1	Mateusz Gamrot	6.3	2.8	2.1	0.75	31%	13
R1	Quillan Salkilld	8.7	3.9	2.0	1.26	26%	5
R2	Mateusz Gamrot	7.0	3.0	3.0	0.86	36%	12
R2	Quillan Salkilld	10.4	4.0	1.6	1.20	70%	1
R3	Mateusz Gamrot	9.1	4.3	3.5	1.20	30%	7
R3	Quillan Salkilld	13.9	8.0	3.8	1.60	27%	1
R4	Mateusz Gamrot	6.9	2.6	3.2	1.00	34%	1
R4	Quillan Salkilld	—	—	—	—	—	—
R5	Mateusz Gamrot	8.1	4.0	4.6	1.00	28%	1
R5	Quillan Salkilld	—	—	—	—	—	—

Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.