Compare Islam Makhachev vs Joshua Van — UFC matchup breakdown
Tale of the Tape
The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
- Islam has 5 months more layoff
Division percentiles below rank both fighters against the Welterweight roster (490 fighters). Islam Makhachev fights at Welterweight; Joshua Van at Flyweight — Joshua Van’s percentiles are measured against a division they don’t compete in, so read them with that in mind.
Recent form
Last five pro bouts (non-UFC fights dashed + tagged), current trajectory, and the level of opposition going into this matchup.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Islam Makhachev | Joshua Van |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | 2-0 | 1-0 |
| Top-5 | 3-0 | 2-0 |
| Top-15 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
| Cross-div champ | 2-0 | — |
| Cross-div ranked | 2-0 | — |
| Contender-level | 1-0 | — |
| Established | 1-0 | — |
| Building | 2-1 | 1-0 |
| Unproven | 1-0 | 3-0 |
- W vs Jack Della MaddalenaCHAMP100Nov 15, 2025 · Champion
- W vs Renato Moicano#1069Jan 18, 2025 · Top-15
- W vs Dustin Poirier#490Jun 1, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Alexander Volkanovski78Oct 21, 2023 · Cross-div champ
- W vs Alexander Volkanovski78Feb 11, 2023 · Cross-div champ
- W vs Charles Oliveira#198Oct 22, 2022 · Champion
- W vs King Green45Feb 26, 2022 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Dan Hooker#878Oct 30, 2021 · Top-5
- W vs Thiago Moises#1462Jul 17, 2021 · Top-15
- W vs Drew Dober#1562Mar 6, 2021 · Top-15
- W vs Davi Ramos18Sep 7, 2019 · Building
- W vs Arman Tsarukyan61Apr 20, 2019 · Top-5
- W vs Kajan Johnson18Jul 28, 2018 · Building
- W vs Gleison Tibau50Jan 20, 2018 · Contender-level
- W vs Nik Lentz45Feb 11, 2017 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Chris Wade26Sep 17, 2016 · Established
- L vs Adriano Martins18Oct 3, 2015 · Building
- W vs Leo Kuntz8May 23, 2015 · Unproven
- W vs Tatsuro Taira#384May 9, 2026 · Top-5
- W vs Alexandre PantojaCHAMP100Dec 6, 2025 · Champion
- W vs Brandon Royval#190Jun 28, 2025 · Top-5
- W vs Bruno Silva45Jun 7, 2025 · Top-15
- W vs Rei Tsuruya15Mar 8, 2025 · Building
- W vs Cody Durden#1463Dec 7, 2024 · Top-15
- W vs Edgar Chairez42Sep 14, 2024 · Top-15
- L vs Charles Johnson49Jul 13, 2024 · Top-15
- W vs Felipe Bunes8Jan 13, 2024 · Unproven
- W vs Kevin Borjas8Nov 11, 2023 · Unproven
- W vs Zhalgas Zhumagulov8Jun 24, 2023 · Unproven
All figures are 0–100 ratings (shown as %), not percentages of anything literal. Schedule strength = the average quality of every UFC opponent faced (win or lose). Win quality = the average quality of the opponents actually beaten. The composite Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with win quality (35%). Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, falling back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. For fighters with limited UFC experience the headline is held toward a rookie baseline, so debut / low-sample fighters read lower than established names. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Career splits
Striking matchup
Each fighter's offense mapped against the other's defense — where one attacks meets where the other gets hit, across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.
Evenly matched striking — no clear edge either way.
Where Makhachev attacks (green = high volume) vs where Van gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Makhachev’s green zones meeting Van’s red zones are the openings.
- Head71%49th344
- Body24%52nd114
- Leg6%22nd27
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes
- Head67%11th571
- Body16%27th132
- Leg17%13th146
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent
- Standing57%278
- Clinch18%89
- Ground24%118
- Standing96%812
- Clinch3%27
- Ground1%10
Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.
Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Islam Makhachev | around division average26.6 | 51% | top 10% of division15.1 | 344 |
| Head | Joshua Van | elite — top of division77.0 | 51% | bottom of the division52.9 | 892 |
| Body | Islam Makhachev | around division average8.8 | 89% | above division average7.7 | 114 |
| Body | Joshua Van | elite — top of division20.7 | 82% | well below average12.9 | 235 |
| Leg | Islam Makhachev | well below average3.2 | 90% | top 29% of division4.6 | 27 |
| Leg | Joshua Van | top 30% of division10.1 | 91% | bottom of the division13.4 | 103 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Takedowns, submission threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.
Each metric graded on the division — the bar leans toward whoever wins that part of the grappling exchange (longer + greener = a bigger edge).
Makhachev holds a decisive grappling edge (+28).
Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Islam Makhachev | Joshua Van |
|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns | 3.141 | 0.88 |
| Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted | 56%41 / 73 | 62%8 / 13 |
| Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced | 91%21 / 23 | 76%56 / 74 |
| Submission attempts / 15career attempts | 1.013 | 0.22 |
| Control time / 15 (min)career total | 7.7 min101:28 | 1.1 min10:40 |
| Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total | 1.2 min15:18 | 2.3 min22:24 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time. Accuracy under 8 career attempts is shown raw and ungraded — too small a sample to rate against the division.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.
When their fights end
every pro finish on the fight clockFinish & durability rates
Full professional career
Full method breakdown
| Outcome | Islam Makhachev | Joshua Van |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 5(18%) | 9(53%) |
| by submission | 13(46%) | 2(12%) |
| by decision | 10(36%) | 6(35%) |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 1(100%) | 1(50%) |
| by submission | 0(0%) | 1(50%) |
| by decision | 0(0%) | 0(0%) |
Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.
KO history
UFC fights only — knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head, then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last time KO'dvs Adriano Martins10y 8mo agoUFC 192: Cormier vs. Gustafsson · Oct 3, 2015 · R1 · 1:46
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
- Last time KO'dvs Charles Johnson1y 11mo agoUFC Fight Night: Namajunas vs. Cortez · Jul 13, 2024 · R3 · 0:20
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
Cardio edge to Van: Van builds (+33% per round through round 3) while Makhachev holds steady (+2% per round through round 5). Within fights that reached round 3, Makhachev lifts to 126% of round-1 output by round 3, Van 219%.
Faded points are drawn from a single bout that reached that round, so they’re less reliable than the solid points averaged over many fights.
Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Islam Makhachev | 5.2 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 47% | 18 |
| R1 | Joshua Van | 4.9 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 0.02 | 1% | 11 |
| R2 | Islam Makhachev | 5.7 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.29 | 50% | 11 |
| R2 | Joshua Van | 11.8 | 11.1 | 6.1 | 0.08 | 11% | 10 |
| R3 | Islam Makhachev | 5.9 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.36 | 57% | 9 |
| R3 | Joshua Van | 11.1 | 10.0 | 6.6 | 0.20 | 12% | 9 |
| R4 | Islam Makhachev | 6.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.57 | 64% | 4 |
| R4 | Joshua Van | 3.9 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 0.00 | 1% | 1 |
| R5 | Islam Makhachev | 5.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.55 | 46% | 3 |
| R5 | Joshua Van | 17.6 | 17.6 | 4.6 | 0.00 | 0% | 1 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.