Compare Mackenzie Dern vs Rose Namajunas — UFC matchup breakdown
Tale of the Tape
The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
- Mackenzie has 2 months more layoff
- Rose is speeding up while opponent slows
Division percentiles below rank both fighters against the Women's Strawweight roster (41 fighters). Mackenzie Dern fights at Women's Strawweight; Rose Namajunas at Women's Flyweight — Rose Namajunas’s percentiles are measured against a division they don’t compete in, so read them with that in mind.
Recent form
Last five pro bouts (non-UFC fights dashed + tagged), current trajectory, and the level of opposition going into this matchup.
Common opponents
Every UFC opponent both fighters have faced — a direct comparison controlling for matchmaking.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Mackenzie Dern | Rose Namajunas |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | 0-1 | 5-3 |
| Top-5 | 2-3 | 0-4 |
| Top-15 | 6-1 | 7-0 |
| Unproven | 3-0 | — |
- W vs Virna Jandiroba#195Oct 25, 2025 · Top-5
- W vs Amanda Ribas#873Jan 11, 2025 · Top-15
- W vs Loopy Godinez#1073Aug 3, 2024 · Top-15
- L vs Amanda Lemos#387Feb 17, 2024 · Top-5
- L vs Jessica Andrade#592Nov 11, 2023 · Champion
- W vs Angela Hill#1368May 20, 2023 · Top-15
- L vs Yan Xiaonan#688Oct 1, 2022 · Top-5
- W vs Tecia Pennington57Apr 9, 2022 · Top-15
- L vs Marina Rodriguez#684Oct 9, 2021 · Top-5
- W vs Nina Nunes55Apr 10, 2021 · Top-15
- W vs Virna Jandiroba#1384Dec 12, 2020 · Top-5
- W vs Randa Markos#1470Sep 19, 2020 · Top-15
- W vs Hannah Cifers12May 30, 2020 · Unproven
- L vs Amanda Ribas51Oct 12, 2019 · Top-15
- W vs Amanda Cooper12May 12, 2018 · Unproven
- W vs Ashley Yoder8Mar 3, 2018 · Unproven
- L vs Natalia Silva#294Jan 24, 2026 · Top-5
- W vs Miranda Maverick#1268Jun 14, 2025 · Top-15
- L vs Erin Blanchfield#391Nov 2, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Tracy Cortez#1170Jul 13, 2024 · Top-15
- W vs Amanda Ribas#872Mar 23, 2024 · Top-15
- L vs Manon Fiorot#393Sep 2, 2023 · Top-5
- L vs Carla Esparza#297May 7, 2022 · Champion
- W vs Zhang Weili#198Nov 6, 2021 · Champion
- W vs Zhang WeiliCHAMP100Apr 24, 2021 · Champion
- W vs Jessica Andrade#198Jul 11, 2020 · Champion
- L vs Jessica Andrade#197May 11, 2019 · Champion
- W vs Joanna Jedrzejczyk#197Apr 7, 2018 · Champion
- W vs Joanna JedrzejczykCHAMP100Nov 4, 2017 · Champion
- W vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez47Apr 15, 2017 · Top-15
- L vs Karolina Kowalkiewicz#584Jul 30, 2016 · Top-5
- W vs Tecia Pennington48Apr 16, 2016 · Top-15
- W vs Paige VanZant#774Dec 10, 2015 · Top-15
- W vs Angela Hill#1567Oct 3, 2015 · Top-15
- L vs Carla Esparza83Dec 12, 2014 · Champion
All figures are 0–100 ratings (shown as %), not percentages of anything literal. Schedule strength = the average quality of every UFC opponent faced (win or lose). Win quality = the average quality of the opponents actually beaten. The composite Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with win quality (35%). Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, falling back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. For fighters with limited UFC experience the headline is held toward a rookie baseline, so debut / low-sample fighters read lower than established names. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Career splits
Striking matchup
Each fighter's offense mapped against the other's defense — where one attacks meets where the other gets hit, across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.
Namajunas has the striking edge (+16).
Where Dern attacks (green = high volume) vs where Namajunas gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Dern’s green zones meeting Namajunas’s red zones are the openings.
- Head75%64th593
- Body14%28th110
- Leg11%36th83
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes
- Head51%76th510
- Body22%62nd216
- Leg28%17th278
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent
- Standing73%573
- Clinch10%79
- Ground17%134
- Standing83%836
- Clinch11%115
- Ground5%53
Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.
Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Mackenzie Dern | above division average38.5 | 36% | above division average32.6 | 593 |
| Head | Rose Namajunas | above division average37.3 | 35% | top 24% of division27.4 | 744 |
| Body | Mackenzie Dern | well below average8.3 | 74% | below division average14.8 | 110 |
| Body | Rose Namajunas | below division average10.3 | 65% | above division average11.3 | 195 |
| Leg | Mackenzie Dern | below division average6.1 | 91% | well below average12.0 | 83 |
| Leg | Rose Namajunas | below division average5.6 | 81% | well below average13.4 | 101 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Takedowns, submission threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.
Each metric graded on the division — the bar leans toward whoever wins that part of the grappling exchange (longer + greener = a bigger edge).
Namajunas has the grappling edge (+10).
Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Mackenzie Dern | Rose Namajunas |
|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns | 0.914 | 1.529 |
| Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted | 18%14 / 76 | 48%29 / 60 |
| Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced | 38%11 / 29 | 62%41 / 66 |
| Submission attempts / 15career attempts | 1.116 | 0.47 |
| Control time / 15 (min)career total | 4.2 min63:41 | 3.0 min58:36 |
| Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total | 2.8 min42:30 | 1.5 min29:46 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time. Accuracy under 8 career attempts is shown raw and ungraded — too small a sample to rate against the division.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.
When their fights end
every pro finish on the fight clockFinish & durability rates
Full professional career
Full method breakdown
| Outcome | Mackenzie Dern | Rose Namajunas |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 0(0%) | 2(14%) |
| by submission | 8(50%) | 5(36%) |
| by decision | 8(50%) | 7(50%) |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 1(20%) | 1(13%) |
| by submission | 0(0%) | 1(13%) |
| by decision | 4(80%) | 6(75%) |
Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.
KO history
UFC fights only — knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head, then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last time KO'dvs Jessica Andrade2y 7mo agoUFC 295: Prochazka vs. Pereira · Nov 11, 2023 · R2 · 3:15
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
- Last time KO'dvs Jessica Andrade7y 1mo agoUFC 237: Namajunas vs. Andrade · May 11, 2019 · R2 · 2:58
- Last time submittedvs Carla Esparza11y 6mo agoThe Ultimate Fighter: A Champion Will Be Crowned Finale · Dec 12, 2014 · R3 · 1:26
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
Cardio edge to Dern: Dern builds (+7% per round through round 5) while Namajunas holds steady (-2% per round through round 5). Within fights that reached round 3, Dern lifts to 109% of round-1 output by round 3, Namajunas 79%.
Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Mackenzie Dern | 5.6 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 0.29 | 30% | 16 |
| R1 | Rose Namajunas | 5.2 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 0.18 | 14% | 19 |
| R2 | Mackenzie Dern | 4.6 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 0.26 | 19% | 12 |
| R2 | Rose Namajunas | 5.5 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 0.25 | 22% | 16 |
| R3 | Mackenzie Dern | 6.0 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 0.47 | 27% | 11 |
| R3 | Rose Namajunas | 3.9 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 0.20 | 18% | 14 |
| R4 | Mackenzie Dern | 6.1 | 4.0 | 6.3 | 0.40 | 25% | 4 |
| R4 | Rose Namajunas | 4.2 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 0.11 | 31% | 7 |
| R5 | Mackenzie Dern | 6.8 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 0.30 | 51% | 4 |
| R5 | Rose Namajunas | 5.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 0.25 | 23% | 7 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.