Zhang Tiequan Record, Stats & Next Fight

UFC fight history

Res	Opponent	Outcome	Finish	Rd	Time	Event	Date
L	Jon Tuck Lightweight	Decision	Unanimous	R3	5:00	UFC Macao: Franklin vs. Le	Nov 10, 2012
L	Issei Tamura Featherweight	KO/TKO	Punch to Head At Distance	R2	0:32	UFC 144: Edgar vs. Henderson	Feb 25, 2012
L	Darren Elkins Featherweight	Decision	Unanimous	R3	5:00	UFC 136: Edgar vs. Maynard 3	Oct 8, 2011
W	Jason Reinhardt Featherweight	Submission	Guillotine Choke After Drop to Guard	R1	0:48	UFC 127: Penn vs. Fitch	Feb 26, 2011

Outside the UFC

14-1across 15 bouts · 14 promotions · wins by 4 KO · 10 subWEC · Legend FC · URCC 15 · UMAC · Xian Sports University +9

Res	Opponent	Outcome	Finish	Rd	Time	Promotion	Date
L	Daniel Downes8-3	Decision	Unanimous	R3	5:00	WEC	Dec 16, 2010
W	Pablo Garza12-4	Submission	Guillotine Choke	R1	2:26	WEC	Sep 30, 2010
W	Daniel Digby12-5	Submission	Neck Crank	R1	0:30	Legend FC	Jun 24, 2010
W	Caloy Baduria11-7-1	Submission	Armbar	R1	4:21	URCC 15	Nov 21, 2009
W	Yonglong Zhu0-1	Submission	Kimura	R1	1:06	UMAC	Apr 18, 2009
W	Arthit Hanchana3-9-1	Submission	Triangle Choke	R2	2:46	Xian Sports University	Jan 10, 2009
W	Caloy Baduria11-7-1	Submission	Guillotine Choke	R1	3:03	URCC 13	Nov 22, 2008
W	Malik Arash Mawlayi5-3-1	KO/TKO	Submission to Punches	R1	8:48	AOW 10	Dec 23, 2007
W	Erik Kalseth0-3	Submission	Ankle Lock	R1	0:49	AOW 9	Nov 25, 2007
W	Seong Hee Kim3-7	Submission	Triangle Choke	R1	1:39	AOW 8	Sep 22, 2007
W	Shashi Sathe0-1-1	KO/TKO	Punches	R1	3:57	AOW 6	May 26, 2007
W	De Gi Ji Ri Hu0-1	KO/TKO	Punch	R1	1:04	AOW 5	Mar 31, 2007
W	Yun Tao Gong0-2	Submission	Rear-Naked Choke	R1	0:59	AOW 4	Dec 22, 2006
W	Salvador Domasian1-4-1	KO/TKO	Punches	R1	4:48	URCC 7	Dec 10, 2005
W	Yanfei Zhao1-2	Submission	Choke	R0	0:00	AOW 1	Nov 6, 2005

Non-UFC bouts (regional/other promotions) and Dana White’s Contender Series — shown for context only, excluded from Schedule Score, striking/grappling rates, and every UFC-scoped metric.

Method of victory & defeat

KO / TKO

4 wins, 1 loss

W4

L1

Submission

11 wins, 0 losses

W11

L0

Decision

0 wins, 3 losses

W0

L3

Finishes

UFC KOs

0

Below avg · 11%Featherweight

Knockdowns / fight

0.00

Below avg · 0.23Featherweight

UFC submissions

1

Above avg · 7%Featherweight

Submission attempts / fight

1.25

Above avg · 0.40Featherweight

KO history

Knockout power and chin durability (UFC; clean KOs only).

Zhang Tiequan

PowerChin

Knockout rate

0%

0 KO/TKO wins

Knockdowns dealt

0

0.00 per 100 head

Clean KO losses

1

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

Knockdowns absorbed

2

3.13 per 100 head

Chin gauges use a league scale: green = clean record, red = bottom ~10% of UFC fighters (4+ KO losses · 6+ knockdowns absorbed).

Never submittedin the UFC

Career striking

OverallD40th

36%52 / 141

Striking accuracy

51%

Striking defense

Sig. strikes / min-0.91 differential

Landed1.23

Absorbed2.14

63%str + td

Defensive rating

Striking edge

-13%accuracy vs opp. landing

worseevenbetter

Strike maps

Sig. strikes by target

Head81%35th42
Body4%24th2
Leg15%37th8

Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes

Sig. strikes by position

100%Standing

Standing100%52
Clinch0%0
Ground0%0

Striking zones

Per-15-minute breakdown — where this fighter lands, and where they get hit.

UFC only

Zhang Tiequan

Landed per 15

Head

F

12th

17.3

12th

Body

F

0th

0.8

0th

Leg

F

15th

3.3

15th

Ranks are division percentiles — e.g. 90th = top 10% of the weight class. Higher is always better: on “absorbed” rows the rank is inverted, so a high rank means they get hit less.

Absorbed per 15

Head

A

70th

26.4

70th

Body

A+

89th

5.4

89th

Leg

A+

97th

1.2

97th

Ranks are division percentiles — e.g. 90th = top 10% of the weight class. Higher is always better: on “absorbed” rows the rank is inverted, so a high rank means they get hit less.

Career totals — landed / attempted

Landed (career total)

Zone	Per 15	Landed	Attempted	Accuracy
Head	17.3	42	126	33%
Body	0.8	2	3	67%
Leg	3.3	8	12	67%

Absorbed (career total)

Zone	Per 15	Landed	Attempted	Accuracy
Head	26.4	64	140	46%
Body	5.4	13	18	72%
Leg	1.2	3	3	100%

UFCStats career rates, per 15 minutes. Percentiles vs the division; absorbed is inverted so higher is better.

Grappling

Per-15-minute breakdown of takedowns, submissions, and ground control.

UFC only

Zhang Tiequan

100%

Takedown accuracy

75%

Takedown defense

Control / 15 min-9.1 min net

On top0.8

On bottom10.0

Offense

Takedowns

C

49th

0.8

49th

TD accuracy

100%

Sub attempts

A

85th

2.1

85th

Control

D

41st

0.8 min

41st

Defense

TD defense

B

64th

75%

64th

Controlled

10.0 min

Career totals — landed / attempted, control time

Offense

Takedowns	2 / 2
Submission attempts	5
Control time	2:01

Defense

TDs defended	6 / 8
Control absorbed	24:07

Rates above are per 15 minutes of UFC fight time (36min total). Value colors reflect the per-15 rate’s percentile against the current weight class baseline; raw totals without a division reference stay neutral.

Pace & fade

Round-by-round work rate, and whether they fade.

UFC only

Zhang Tiequan

4 UFC bouts (per‑round) · 36 min

338%

R3 pace · 2 bouts

Tiequan builds (+53% per round through round 3). Within fights that reached round 3, Tiequan lifts to 338% of round-1 output by round 3 (2 bouts).

Tiequan ▲ BUILDSOutput / min

Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.

Full per-round breakdown

What drives the pace · per round

The composite output line above blends these three inputs — splitting them out shows whether the work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control, and which input fades.

Sig. strikes landed

Tiequanlanded / min

Takedown attempts

Tiequanattempts / min

Control time

Tiequan% of round

Round	Output / min	Sig landed / min	Sig absorbed / min	TD att / min	Control	Bouts
R1	1.0	0.6	1.8	0.06	5%	4
R2	2.0	1.3	1.5	0.09	9%	3
R3	3.0	2.9	3.6	0.00	4%	2

Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length.

Schedule Score

Opponent quality, ranked across the UFC. Recent fights weighted heavier.

UFC only

Zhang Tiequan

4 resolved UFC bouts

Schedule Score

30/ 100

0255075100

Schedule strength

F

19th

20%

19th

Win quality

D

31st

33%

31st

Limited UFC sample (4 bouts). The headline Schedule Score is held toward a rookie baseline until a fighter has 6+ UFC bouts — a thin UFC résumé hasn’t yet proven a strong schedule. The component bars above are not down-weighted.

Opponent quality distribution

Every UFC bout, grouped by who the opponent was at the time.

1

2

Top-15Ranked #6–#15 at the time
Building3+ UFC fights, ≥.40 win rate
UnprovenFewer than 3 fights, or sub-.40 win rate

Tier	Bouts	Record	Win rate
Top-15	1	0-1	0%
Building	1	0-1	0%
Unproven	2	1-1	50%

Highest-quality opponents

Toughest opponents on the scheduleScore, scored at the time of the fight.

Pre-UFC opposition

Moderate

Opponents' combined record

67-59-6

.532 win rate

Winning-record opponents

6 of 15

carried winning pro records

Pro bouts faced

15

all opponents have records on file

A descriptive read of the non-UFC slate from opponents’ full career pro records — not a UFC-grade Schedule Score.

All bouts — opponent quality bout-by-bout

Res	Opponent	Tier	Score	Date
L	Jon Tuck	Building	15	Nov 10, 2012
L	Issei Tamura	Unproven	8	Feb 25, 2012
L	Darren Elkins	Top-15	52	Oct 8, 2011
W	Jason Reinhardt	Unproven	8	Feb 26, 2011

Per-bout quality scoring: champion = 100; same-division ranks 1–5 = 90 → 78 linear; ranks 6–15 = 75 → 60 linear; cross-division champion = 78; cross-division ranked = 45; title-fight challenger (no rank signal) = 50, bumped to 65 when opp had an elite career UFC record at the time. Unranked opponents are scored on UFC record-at-time (long-tenured vet 60, contender-level 45, established 30, building 18, unproven 8). P4P top-10 at time adds +5; top-3 adds +8 (capped at 100). The Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) and quality wins (35%), then is held toward a rookie baseline for fighters with limited UFC experience so a thin résumé reads honestly low.

Career cohorts

4 resolved UFC bouts

Performance broken down by situation — camp length, response to the previous result, title-fight presence, and rematches. Computed across every completed UFC bout.

Camp length

Days between fights

Short turnaround

< 100 days

—

Typical camp

100–180 days

0-1

1 bout

Long layoff

> 180 days

0-2

2 bouts

UFC debut

first UFC bout

1-0

1 bout

Post-result bounce

Performance based on the previous UFC result

After a loss

next bout after a defeat

0-2

2 bouts

After a win

next bout after a win

0-1

1 bout

First UFC bout

no precedent

1-0

1 bout

Title fights

Performance with a belt on the line

All title fights

as challenger or champion

—

As champion

defending the belt

—

As challenger

fighting for the belt

—

Rematches

Performance when meeting an opponent again

All rematches

any second meeting

—

Revenge bouts

lost the first meeting

—

Encore bouts

won the first meeting

—

Activity & layoff

Last fight, activity, and divisional context.

Time since last UFC bout

13y 7mo

Active

0–6 mo

Normal

6–12 mo

Layoff

12–18 mo

Extended

18+ mo

Zhang Tiequan

Extended layoff

13y 7mosince last bout

vs Jon Tuck · Nov 10, 2012

DraftKings fantasy scoring

DFS

37.7

DK avg

29.5

Median

116.6

Ceiling

2.2

Floor

25%

Boom

50%

Bust

Pro

See Zhang Tiequan's DK score in every fight

The full fantasy-points log with closing lines — sortable, filterable, with a live summary — for all 4 UFC bouts.

Unlock with Pro →