Compare Holly Holm vs Rose Namajunas — UFC matchup breakdown
Tale of the Tape
The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
- Holly has 1y 9mo more layoff
- Rose is speeding up while opponent slows
Division percentiles below rank both fighters against the Bantamweight roster (341 fighters). Holly Holm fights at Bantamweight; Rose Namajunas at Women's Flyweight — Rose Namajunas’s percentiles are measured against a division they don’t compete in, so read them with that in mind.
Recent form
Last five pro bouts (non-UFC fights dashed + tagged), current trajectory, and the level of opposition going into this matchup.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Holly Holm | Rose Namajunas |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | 3-3 | 5-3 |
| Top-5 | 2-2, 1 NC | 0-4 |
| Top-15 | 2-0 | 7-0 |
| Cross-div ranked | 0-1 | — |
| Title-fight challenger | 0-1 | — |
| Building | 1-0 | — |
- L vs Kayla Harrison68Apr 13, 2024 · Champion
- NC vs Mayra Bueno Silva#1081Jul 15, 2023 · Top-5
- W vs Yana Santos#677Mar 25, 2023 · Top-5
- L vs Ketlen Vieira#584May 21, 2022 · Top-5
- W vs Irene Aldana#683Oct 3, 2020 · Top-5
- W vs Raquel Pennington#592Jan 18, 2020 · Champion
- L vs Amanda NunesCHAMP100Jul 6, 2019 · Champion
- W vs Megan Anderson15Jun 9, 2018 · Building
- L vs Cristiane Justino50Dec 30, 2017 · Title-fight challenger
- W vs Bethe Correia#1171Jun 17, 2017 · Top-15
- L vs Germaine de Randamie45Feb 11, 2017 · Cross-div ranked
- L vs Valentina Shevchenko#789Jul 23, 2016 · Top-5
- L vs Miesha Tate#296Mar 5, 2016 · Champion
- W vs Ronda RouseyCHAMP100Nov 14, 2015 · Champion
- W vs Marion Reneau#1172Jul 15, 2015 · Top-15
- W vs Raquel Pennington#1288Feb 28, 2015 · Champion
- L vs Natalia Silva#294Jan 24, 2026 · Top-5
- W vs Miranda Maverick#1268Jun 14, 2025 · Top-15
- L vs Erin Blanchfield#391Nov 2, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Tracy Cortez#1170Jul 13, 2024 · Top-15
- W vs Amanda Ribas#872Mar 23, 2024 · Top-15
- L vs Manon Fiorot#393Sep 2, 2023 · Top-5
- L vs Carla Esparza#297May 7, 2022 · Champion
- W vs Zhang Weili#198Nov 6, 2021 · Champion
- W vs Zhang WeiliCHAMP100Apr 24, 2021 · Champion
- W vs Jessica Andrade#198Jul 11, 2020 · Champion
- L vs Jessica Andrade#197May 11, 2019 · Champion
- W vs Joanna Jedrzejczyk#197Apr 7, 2018 · Champion
- W vs Joanna JedrzejczykCHAMP100Nov 4, 2017 · Champion
- W vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez47Apr 15, 2017 · Top-15
- L vs Karolina Kowalkiewicz#584Jul 30, 2016 · Top-5
- W vs Tecia Pennington48Apr 16, 2016 · Top-15
- W vs Paige VanZant#774Dec 10, 2015 · Top-15
- W vs Angela Hill#1567Oct 3, 2015 · Top-15
- L vs Carla Esparza83Dec 12, 2014 · Champion
All figures are 0–100 ratings (shown as %), not percentages of anything literal. Schedule strength = the average quality of every UFC opponent faced (win or lose). Win quality = the average quality of the opponents actually beaten. The composite Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with win quality (35%). Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, falling back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. For fighters with limited UFC experience the headline is held toward a rookie baseline, so debut / low-sample fighters read lower than established names. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Career splits
Striking matchup
Each fighter's offense mapped against the other's defense — where one attacks meets where the other gets hit, across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.
Evenly matched striking — no clear edge either way.
Where Holm attacks (green = high volume) vs where Namajunas gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Holm’s green zones meeting Namajunas’s red zones are the openings.
- Head47%32nd362
- Body30%71st236
- Leg23%73rd180
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes
- Head51%66th510
- Body22%44th216
- Leg28%16th278
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent
- Standing82%638
- Clinch11%88
- Ground7%52
- Standing83%836
- Clinch11%115
- Ground5%53
Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.
Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Holly Holm | below division average23.1 | 27% | top 28% of division25.0 | 362 |
| Head | Rose Namajunas | above division average36.8 | 35% | above division average27.2 | 744 |
| Body | Holly Holm | top 29% of division13.6 | 66% | below division average11.8 | 236 |
| Body | Rose Namajunas | around division average10.0 | 65% | below division average11.0 | 195 |
| Leg | Holly Holm | top 27% of division10.4 | 72% | around division average8.7 | 180 |
| Leg | Rose Namajunas | below division average5.5 | 81% | well below average13.4 | 101 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Takedowns, submission threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.
Each metric graded on the division — the bar leans toward whoever wins that part of the grappling exchange (longer + greener = a bigger edge).
Evenly matched grappling — no clear edge either way.
Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Holly Holm | Rose Namajunas |
|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns | 0.915 | 1.529 |
| Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted | 31%15 / 49 | 48%29 / 60 |
| Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced | 76%29 / 38 | 62%41 / 66 |
| Submission attempts / 15career attempts | 0.11 | 0.47 |
| Control time / 15 (min)career total | 3.5 min58:49 | 3.0 min58:36 |
| Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total | 1.1 min18:27 | 1.5 min29:46 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time. Accuracy under 8 career attempts is shown raw and ungraded — too small a sample to rate against the division.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.
When their fights end
every pro finish on the fight clockFinish & durability rates
Full professional career
Full method breakdown
| Outcome | Holly Holm | Rose Namajunas |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 8(53%) | 2(14%) |
| by submission | 0(0%) | 5(36%) |
| by decision | 7(47%) | 7(50%) |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 1(14%) | 1(13%) |
| by submission | 2(29%) | 1(13%) |
| by decision | 4(57%) | 6(75%) |
Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.
KO history
UFC fights only — knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head, then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last time KO'dvs Amanda Nunes6y 11mo agoUFC 239: Jones vs. Santos · Jul 6, 2019 · R1 · 4:10
- Last time submittedvs Kayla Harrison2y 2mo agoUFC 300: Pereira vs. Hill · Apr 13, 2024 · R2 · 1:47
- Last time KO'dvs Jessica Andrade7y 1mo agoUFC 237: Namajunas vs. Andrade · May 11, 2019 · R2 · 2:58
- Last time submittedvs Carla Esparza11y 6mo agoThe Ultimate Fighter: A Champion Will Be Crowned Finale · Dec 12, 2014 · R3 · 1:26
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
Cardio edge to Holm: Holm builds (+12% per round through round 5) while Namajunas holds steady (-2% per round through round 5). Within fights that reached round 3, Holm lifts to 139% of round-1 output by round 3, Namajunas 79%.
Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Holly Holm | 3.6 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 0.13 | 21% | 15 |
| R1 | Rose Namajunas | 5.2 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 0.18 | 14% | 19 |
| R2 | Holly Holm | 4.5 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 0.18 | 29% | 14 |
| R2 | Rose Namajunas | 5.5 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 0.25 | 22% | 16 |
| R3 | Holly Holm | 5.0 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.30 | 26% | 12 |
| R3 | Rose Namajunas | 3.9 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 0.20 | 18% | 14 |
| R4 | Holly Holm | 5.1 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 0.17 | 14% | 6 |
| R4 | Rose Namajunas | 4.2 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 0.11 | 31% | 7 |
| R5 | Holly Holm | 6.3 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 0.21 | 21% | 6 |
| R5 | Rose Namajunas | 5.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 0.25 | 23% | 7 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.