Nadia Kassem Record, Stats & Next Fight

UFC fight history

Res	Opponent	Outcome	Finish	Rd	Time	Event	Date
L	Ji Yeon Kim Women's Flyweight	KO/TKO	Punch to Body At Distance	R2	4:59	UFC 243: Whittaker vs. Adesanya	Oct 5, 2019
L	#14Montana De La Rosa Women's Flyweight	Submission	Armbar From Mount	R2	2:37	UFC 234: Adesanya vs. Silva	Feb 9, 2019
W	Alex Chambers Women's Strawweight	Decision	Unanimous	R3	5:00	UFC Fight Night: Werdum vs. Tybura	Nov 18, 2017

Outside the UFC

4-0across 4 bouts · 3 promotions · wins by 4 KOJNI Promotions · UFN 9 · UFN 5

Res	Opponent	Outcome	Finish	Rd	Time	Promotion	Date
W	Jasita Yotawan0-1	KO/TKO	Punches	R1	1:27	JNI Promotions	Feb 24, 2017
W	Leigha Aurisch0-3	KO/TKO	Head Kick and Punches	R1	0:19	UFN 9	Dec 3, 2016
W	Belinda Sedgwick0-6	KO/TKO	Spinning Backfist	R1	0:10	UFN 5	Dec 12, 2015
W	Jiang Zhu0-1	KO/TKO	Punch	R1	0:26	JNI Promotions	Aug 28, 2015

Non-UFC bouts (regional/other promotions) and Dana White’s Contender Series — shown for context only, excluded from Schedule Score, striking/grappling rates, and every UFC-scoped metric.

Amateur

1-0across 1 amateur bout · 1 promotionUFN 2

Res	Opponent	Outcome	Finish	Rd	Time	Promotion	Date
W	Morgan Graham1-2	Submission	Armbar	R2	1:17	UFN 2	Apr 4, 2015

Amateur (pre-professional) bouts — shown for context only and excluded from the professional record and every UFC-scoped metric.

Method of victory & defeat

KO / TKO

4 wins, 1 loss

W4

L1

Submission

0 wins, 1 loss

W0

L1

Decision

1 win, 0 losses

W1

L0

Finishes

UFC KOs

0

Below avg · 9%Flyweight

Knockdowns / fight

0.00

Below avg · 0.22Flyweight

UFC submissions

0

Below avg · 8%Flyweight

Submission attempts / fight

2.00

Above avg · 0.48Flyweight

KO history

Knockout power and chin durability (UFC; clean KOs only).

Nadia Kassem

PowerChin

Knockout rate

0%

0 KO/TKO wins

Knockdowns dealt

0

0.00 per 100 head

Clean KO losses

1

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

Knockdowns absorbed

1

0.89 per 100 head

Chin gauges use a league scale: green = clean record, red = bottom ~10% of UFC fighters (4+ KO losses · 6+ knockdowns absorbed).

Decision behavior

Judging

1 scorecard on file

Nadia Kassem

Unanimous1 decision · 100%

1W

Split

None

Majority

None

10-8 rounds

2 rounds total

2

Won

0

Lost

Most frequent judges

All judges →

Scorecard data ingested from MMA Decisions

Career striking

OverallD36th

41%102 / 243

Striking accuracy

48%

Striking defense

Sig. strikes / min-1.35 differential

Landed3.13

Absorbed4.48

44%str + td

Defensive rating

Striking edge

-11%accuracy vs opp. landing

worseevenbetter

Strike maps

Sig. strikes by target

Head34%38th35
Body48%85th49
Leg18%59th18

Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes

Sig. strikes by position

77%Standing

Standing77%79
Clinch16%16
Ground7%7

Striking zones

Per-15-minute breakdown — where this fighter lands, and where they get hit.

UFC only

Nadia Kassem

Landed per 15

Head

F

17th

16.1

17th

Body

A+

93rd

22.5

93rd

Leg

B

59th

8.3

59th

Ranks are division percentiles — e.g. 90th = top 10% of the weight class. Higher is always better: on “absorbed” rows the rank is inverted, so a high rank means they get hit less.

Absorbed per 15

Head

F

13th

51.5

13th

Body

C

52nd

10.6

52nd

Leg

A

72nd

5.1

72nd

Ranks are division percentiles — e.g. 90th = top 10% of the weight class. Higher is always better: on “absorbed” rows the rank is inverted, so a high rank means they get hit less.

Career totals — landed / attempted

Landed (career total)

Zone	Per 15	Landed	Attempted	Accuracy
Head	16.1	35	135	26%
Body	22.5	49	84	58%
Leg	8.3	18	24	75%

Absorbed (career total)

Zone	Per 15	Landed	Attempted	Accuracy
Head	51.5	112	232	48%
Body	10.6	23	31	74%
Leg	5.1	11	21	52%

UFCStats career rates, per 15 minutes. Percentiles vs the division; absorbed is inverted so higher is better.

Grappling

Per-15-minute breakdown of takedowns, submissions, and ground control.

UFC only

Nadia Kassem

33%

Takedown accuracy

40%

Takedown defense

Control / 15 min-5.0 min net

On top1.5

On bottom6.5

Offense

Takedowns

C

49th

0.5

49th

TD accuracy

33%

Sub attempts

A+

91st

2.8

91st

Control

C

51st

1.5 min

51st

Defense

TD defense

D

27th

40%

27th

Controlled

6.5 min

Career totals — landed / attempted, control time

Offense

Takedowns	1 / 3
Submission attempts	6
Control time	3:22

Defense

TDs defended	4 / 10
Control absorbed	14:13

Rates above are per 15 minutes of UFC fight time (33min total). Value colors reflect the per-15 rate’s percentile against the current weight class baseline; raw totals without a division reference stay neutral.

Pace & fade

Round-by-round work rate, and whether they fade.

UFC only

Nadia Kassem

3 UFC bouts (per‑round) · 33 min

—

< 2 bouts to R3

Kassem hasn't reached the third round in enough UFC bouts to read a reliable pace pattern — most of their fights end early. The round-by-round pace below is shown for what rounds there are.

KassemOutput / min

Faded points are drawn from a single bout that reached that round, so they’re less reliable than the solid points averaged over many fights.

Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.

Full per-round breakdown

What drives the pace · per round

The composite output line above blends these three inputs — splitting them out shows whether the work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control, and which input fades.

Sig. strikes landed

Kassemlanded / min

Takedown attempts

Kassemattempts / min

Control time

Kassem% of round

Round	Output / min	Sig landed / min	Sig absorbed / min	TD att / min	Control	Bouts
R1	3.5	2.5	3.4	0.20	8%	3
R2	4.1	3.6	6.1	0.00	13%	3
R3	4.2	3.8	3.6	0.00	10%	1

Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length.

Schedule Score

Opponent quality, ranked across the UFC. Recent fights weighted heavier.

UFC only

Nadia Kassem

3 resolved UFC bouts · 1 ranked at the time

Schedule Score

32/ 100

0255075100

Schedule strength

A

75th

46%

75th

Win quality

F

3rd

12%

3rd

Limited UFC sample (3 bouts). The headline Schedule Score is held toward a rookie baseline until a fighter has 6+ UFC bouts — a thin UFC résumé hasn’t yet proven a strong schedule. The component bars above are not down-weighted.

Opponent quality distribution

Every UFC bout, grouped by who the opponent was at the time.

1

Top-5Ranked #1–#5 at the time
Top-15Ranked #6–#15 at the time
UnprovenFewer than 3 fights, or sub-.40 win rate

Tier	Bouts	Record	Win rate
Top-5	1	0-1	0%
Top-15	1	0-1	0%
Unproven	1	1-0	100%

Highest-quality opponents

Toughest opponents on the scheduleScore, scored at the time of the fight.

Pre-UFC opposition

Developmental

Opponents' combined record

0-11

.000 win rate

Winning-record opponents

0 of 4

carried winning pro records

Pro bouts faced

4

all opponents have records on file

A descriptive read of the non-UFC slate from opponents’ full career pro records — not a UFC-grade Schedule Score.

All bouts — opponent quality bout-by-bout

Res	Opponent	Tier	Score	Date
L	Ji Yeon Kim	Top-15	48	Oct 5, 2019
L	Montana De La Rosa#14	Top-5	72	Feb 9, 2019
W	Alex Chambers	Unproven	8	Nov 18, 2017

Per-bout quality scoring: champion = 100; same-division ranks 1–5 = 90 → 78 linear; ranks 6–15 = 75 → 60 linear; cross-division champion = 78; cross-division ranked = 45; title-fight challenger (no rank signal) = 50, bumped to 65 when opp had an elite career UFC record at the time. Unranked opponents are scored on UFC record-at-time (long-tenured vet 60, contender-level 45, established 30, building 18, unproven 8). P4P top-10 at time adds +5; top-3 adds +8 (capped at 100). The Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) and quality wins (35%), then is held toward a rookie baseline for fighters with limited UFC experience so a thin résumé reads honestly low.

Career cohorts

3 resolved UFC bouts

Performance broken down by situation — camp length, response to the previous result, title-fight presence, and rematches. Computed across every completed UFC bout.

Camp length

Days between fights

Short turnaround

< 100 days

—

Typical camp

100–180 days

—

Long layoff

> 180 days

0-2

2 bouts

UFC debut

first UFC bout

1-0

1 bout

Post-result bounce

Performance based on the previous UFC result

After a loss

next bout after a defeat

0-1

1 bout

After a win

next bout after a win

0-1

1 bout

First UFC bout

no precedent

1-0

1 bout

Title fights

Performance with a belt on the line

All title fights

as challenger or champion

—

As champion

defending the belt

—

As challenger

fighting for the belt

—

Rematches

Performance when meeting an opponent again

All rematches

any second meeting

—

Revenge bouts

lost the first meeting

—

Encore bouts

won the first meeting

—

Activity & layoff

Last fight, activity, and divisional context.

Time since last UFC bout

6y 9mo

Active

0–6 mo

Normal

6–12 mo

Layoff

12–18 mo

Extended

18+ mo

Nadia Kassem

Extended layoff

6y 9mosince last bout

vs Ji Yeon Kim · Oct 5, 2019

DraftKings fantasy scoring

DFSAs favorite 1-0As underdog 0-2

37.3

DK avg

26.5

Median

79.8

Ceiling

5.5

Floor

0%

Boom

33%

Bust

Pro

See Nadia Kassem's DK score in every fight

The full fantasy-points log with closing lines — sortable, filterable, with a live summary — for all 3 UFC bouts.

Unlock with Pro →