Alexia Thainara vs Amanda Lemos — Compare

Matchup read

Where each fighter holds an edge — offense against the opponent's defense.

Alexia Thainara

edge

Amanda Lemos

Striking

◂ Thainara

Thainara out-strikes Lemos

Effective offense

B

64th

2.0

+20

C

44th

1.5

Defense

A+

85th

59%

+40

C

46th

45%

KO power

F

0 KO

0.0 KD

+33

C

8 KO

0.4 KD

See full Striking →

Wrestling

◂ Thainara

Thainara has the bigger wrestling edge on Lemos (thin sample)

Takedowns landed

A+

97th

4.2

+57

D

40th

0.9

Takedown accuracy

B

66th

48%

+14

A

80th

58%

Takedown defense

100%

63%

Control time

A+

100th

9.3 min

+57

C

43rd

2.4 min

See full Grappling →

Submission

◂ Thainara

Thainara is the bigger submission threat on Lemos

Submission attempts

A+

95th

1.5

+15

A

80th

0.7

Sub win rate

A

80th

57%

8 subs

+18

B

62nd

20%

3 subs

Submission defense

D

38th

7%

Even

D

37th

10%

See full Grappling →

Finishing

Lemos ▸

Lemos is more likely to finish Thainara

Finish rate

C

49th

25%

+16

B

66th

56%

KO durability

C

45th

0%

Even

D

40th

6%

Submission defense

C

43rd

0%

Even

D

35th

13%

See full Finishes →

Pace

◂ Thainara

Thainara pushes the higher work rate over the fight

Work rate / min — full fight

8.4

3.9

Work rate / min — rounds 1–2

8.7

4.1

Pace trend

-6%/rd

-11%/rd

See full Pace →

Form

◂ Thainara

Thainara is in better recent form than Lemos

Win rate (career)

100%

56%

After a win

100%

56%

Last 5

100%

20%

Win streakW5L3

See full Form →

Schedule

Lemos ▸

Lemos has faced the tougher schedule vs Thainara

Schedule strength

51%

74%

Win quality

94%

41%

Ranked opponents

2

12

Title-holder bouts

0

1

See full Schedule →

Activity

Even

Similar activity going in

Last bout

<1mo

Even

<1mo

Bouts, last 12 mo

3

Even

3

Bouts, last 24 mo

5

4

See full Activity →

Tale of the tape

◂ Thainara

Thainara 2" reach · Thainara 11y younger · Open-stance matchup

Alexia ThainaravsAmanda Lemos

28

Age

11y

younger

39

5'4"

163cm

Height

Even

5'4"

163cm

67"

170cm

Reach

2"

reach

65"

165cm

Edge sizeSlightNotableMajor

See full Tale of the tape →

Core metrics

Each fighter's career rates as a division percentile.

Alexia ThainaraAmanda Lemos

Percentile

Striking/min4.622.75

Accuracy%43%55%

Defense%59%45%

Takedowns/154.51.0

TD defense%100%63%

Submissions/151.80.7

Career rate as a percentile within the women's strawweight (100 fighters) — further right is better. Descriptive research, not a prediction.

Career splits

ThainaraAlexia Thainara

Stat

LemosAmanda Lemos

0

—

KO / TKO

3

1

—

Submission

2

3

—

Decision

4

12:23

Avg fight time

11:02

Alexia Thainara’s splits

vs Lemos

vs Orthodox

3-0100%

vs Switch

0-0no data

vs Longer reach

0-0no data

Highlighted row matches this opponent’s profile — tap it to see who it counts.

Amanda Lemos’s splits

vs Thainara

vs Southpaw

1-150%

vs Switch

0-10%

vs Shorter reach

5-456%

Highlighted row matches this opponent’s profile — tap it to see who it counts.

Tale of the Tape

The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.

Alexia ThainaravsAmanda Lemos

28

Age

11y

younger

39

5'4"

163cm

Height

Even

5'4"

163cm

67"

170cm

Reach

2"

reach

65"

165cm

Edge sizeSlightNotableMajor

DFS scoring matchupDraftKings

Pro

Compare their DraftKings scoring

Career DK fantasy averages, ceilings, and boom/bust rates — side by side — to pick the better DFS play.

Unlock with Pro →

Striking matchup

Each fighter's offense against the other's defense, per 15 minutes.

UFC only

Overall Striking

Striking

C

54th

+9

C

46th

Thainara has the striking edge (+9).

Attacking

Thainara’s offensevsLemos’s defense

Where Thainara attacks (green = high volume) vs where Lemos gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Thainara’s green zones meeting Lemos’s red zones are the openings.

Alexia ThainaraOffense

Head49%46th103
Body26%60th55
Leg24%78th51

Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes

Amanda LemosDefense

Head56%71st317
Body25%55th141
Leg19%49th110

Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent

Thainara — by position

64%Standing

Standing64%134
Clinch22%45
Ground14%30

Lemos — absorbed by position

54%Standing

Standing54%306
Clinch26%147
Ground20%115

Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.

Thainara’s offensevsLemos’s defense

Head

C

46th

33.0

+25

A

71st

29.2

Body

B

60th

15.1

Even

C

55th

12.4

Leg

A

78th

12.4

+29

C

49th

9.3

Lemos’s offensevsThainara’s defense

Head

D

28th

28.7

+46

A

75th

28.0

Body

D

32nd

10.2

+13

C

45th

14.1

Leg

D

42nd

6.7

+13

C

55th

8.3

Full breakdown — all zones, both views

Zone	Fighter	Landed / 15	Accuracy	Absorbed / 15	Career landed
Head	Alexia Thainara	around division average33.0	41%	top 25% of division28.0	103
Head	Amanda Lemos	well below average28.7	47%	top 29% of division29.2	318
Body	Alexia Thainara	above division average15.1	70%	around division average14.1	55
Body	Amanda Lemos	below division average10.2	73%	above division average12.4	111
Leg	Alexia Thainara	top 22% of division12.4	72%	above division average8.3	51
Leg	Amanda Lemos	below division average6.7	92%	around division average9.3	72

Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.

Grappling matchup

Takedowns, submission threat, and control, per 15 minutes.

UFC only

Alexia Thainara

Amanda Lemos

Overall Grappling

Grappling

A

84th

+23

B

61st

Thainara has the grappling edge (+23).

Takedowns

A+

88th

4.2

+40

C

48th

0.9

Takedown accuracy

B

66th

48%

14/29

+14

A

80th

58%

11/19

Takedown defense

100%

4/4

C

52nd

63%

33/52

Submission threat

A+

88th

1.5

+10

A

78th

0.7

Control time

A+

93rd

9.3 min

+48

C

45th

2.4 min

Full breakdown — career grappling totals

Metric	Alexia Thainara	Amanda Lemos
Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns	4.214	0.911
Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted	48%14 / 29	58%11 / 19
Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced	100%4 / 4	63%33 / 52
Submission attempts / 15career attempts	1.55	0.78
Control time / 15 (min)career total	9.3 min30:43	2.4 min28:19
Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total	0.2 min0:33	6.3 min74:04

UFCStats career rates, per 15 minutes. Takedown defense = stops ÷ attempts. Under 8 attempts shown ungraded.

Schedule Score

Opponent quality, ranked against every UFC fighter (≥3 bouts).

UFC only

Alexia Thainara

48

Schedule Score

Amanda Lemos

65

Schedule Score

UFC experienceTotal octagon time + bouts

50 min

4 bouts

Octagon time

127 min

more

177 min

16 bouts

Schedule strength

51%

74%

Win quality

94%

41%

Ranked opponents

2

12

Title-holder bouts

0

1

Per-tier records + bout-by-bout

Per-tier records

Tier	Alexia Thainara	Amanda Lemos
Champion	—	1-2
Top-5	1-0	1-3
Ranked 6–15	1-0	5-2
Cross-div ranked	1-0	—
Unproven	1-0	2-0

Alexia Thainara — bouts

Amanda Lemos — bouts

0–100 ratings. Schedule strength = average opponent quality faced; Win quality = quality of opponents beaten. Composite = 65% schedule + 35% wins, scored on rank-at-time-of-fight.

Recent form

Last five pro bouts and recent opposition.

Alexia Thainara

Amanda Lemos

Thainara — last 5

recent → old

Lemos — last 5

recent → old

Last 5 record

5-0

1-4

Current streak

W5

L3

Ranked opps

2 of 5

5 of 5

Layoff

1 d

Even

1 d

Career cohorts

Each fighter’s record by situation, over every completed UFC bout. Read down a fighter’s column; bold marks the better win rate (3+ bouts).

Alexia Thainara

Amanda Lemos

Post-result bounce

SituationThainara Lemos

After a loss

—

4-267%

After a win

3-0100%

5-456%

Camp length

SituationThainara Lemos

Short turnaround< 100 days

—

1-0100%

Typical camp100–180 days

1-0100%

3-350%

Long layoff> 180 days

2-0100%

5-363%

Title fights

SituationThainara Lemos

All title fightschallenger or champ

—

0-10%

As challengerfor the belt

—

0-10%

Finishing & durability

How fights end for each — finish rate and durability.

Alexia Thainara

Amanda Lemos

When their fights end

every pro finish on the fight clock

Thainara8W–1L by finish

R1

R2

R3

Lemos11W–3L by finish · 73% in round 1

R1

R2

R3

0:00

5:00

10:00

15:00

Win(above)Loss(below)KO / TKOSubmissionPosition = when the fight ended

Finish & durability rates

Full professional career

Finish rate

↑16%·Lemos

percent of wins ending by KO or submission

↑16%·Lemos

C

50th

57%

+21

A

71st

73%

Goes the distance

Even

percent of resolved bouts going to a decision (style read, not quality)

Even

40%

33%

KO durability

↑5%·Thainara

percent of resolved bouts ending in a KO/TKO loss

↑5%·Thainara

C

56th

0%

+10

C

46th

5%

Submission defense

Even

percent of resolved bouts ending by submission loss

Even

D

42nd

7%

+9

D

33rd

10%

Full method breakdown

Outcome	Alexia Thainara	Amanda Lemos
Wins
by KO / TKO	0(0%)	8(53%)
by submission	8(57%)	3(20%)
by decision	6(43%)	4(27%)
Losses
by KO / TKO	0(0%)	1(17%)
by submission	1(100%)	2(33%)
by decision	0(0%)	3(50%)

Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.

KO history

Knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head (UFC).

Alexia Thainara

vs

Amanda Lemos

0%

0 KO/TKO in 5 bouts

Knockout rate

19%

3 KO/TKO in 16 bouts

0

0.0 / 100 head

Knockdowns dealt

6

1.9 / 100 head

0

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

Clean KO losses

1

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

0

0.0 / 100 head

Knockdowns absorbed

1

0.3 / 100 head

Chin bars use a league scale: green = clean record, red = bottom ~10% of UFC fighters (4+ KO losses · 6+ knockdowns absorbed).

Alexia ThainaraFinish timeline

Last time KO'd
Never finished by strikes in the UFC
Last time submitted
Never submitted in the UFC

Amanda LemosFinish timeline

Last time KO'd
vs Leslie Smith9 years ago
UFC Fight Night: Nelson vs. Ponzinibbio · Jul 16, 2017 · R2 · 2:53
Last time submitted
vs Virna Jandiroba2 years ago
UFC Fight Night: Lemos vs. Jandiroba · Jul 20, 2024 · R2 · 4:48

Pace & fade

Round-by-round work rate, and whether they fade.

UFC only

Alexia Thainara

80%

R3 vs R1 · 3 bouts reaching R3

Amanda Lemos

90%

R3 vs R1 · 9 bouts reaching R3

No clear cardio edge — Thainara fades (-7% per round through round 3) and Lemos fades (-10% per round through round 3). Within fights that reached round 3, Thainara drops to 80% of round-1 output by round 3, Lemos 90%.

Thainara ▼ FADES

Lemos ▼ FADESOutput / min

Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.

Full per-round breakdown — both fighters

What drives the pace · per round

The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.

Sig. strikes landed

Thainara

Lemoslanded / min

Takedown attempts

Thainara

Lemosattempts / min

Control time

Thainara

Lemos% of round

Round	Fighter	Output / min	Sig landed / min	Sig absorbed / min	TD att / min	Control	Bouts
R1	Alexia Thainara	8.9	4.7	2.9	0.67	56%	4
R1	Amanda Lemos	4.2	3.3	2.7	0.10	16%	16
R2	Alexia Thainara	8.5	4.3	2.9	0.53	66%	3
R2	Amanda Lemos	4.0	2.7	3.3	0.17	21%	12
R3	Alexia Thainara	7.8	3.6	2.1	0.53	66%	3
R3	Amanda Lemos	3.4	2.6	2.8	0.07	13%	9
R4	Alexia Thainara	—	—	—	—	—	—
R4	Amanda Lemos	2.7	2.6	5.6	0.00	2%	1
R5	Alexia Thainara	—	—	—	—	—	—
R5	Amanda Lemos	0.3	0.2	11.0	0.00	3%	1

Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.