Compare Charles Oliveira vs Khamzat Chimaev — UFC matchup breakdown
Tale of the Tape
The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.
Activity & layoff
The recency dimension Tale of the Tape doesn't carry. How active each fighter has been, and how that compares to active peers in their division.
- Charles is speeding up while opponent slows
Division percentiles below rank both fighters against the Lightweight roster (470 fighters). Charles Oliveira fights at Lightweight; Khamzat Chimaev at Middleweight — Khamzat Chimaev’s percentiles are measured against a division they don’t compete in, so read them with that in mind.
Recent form
Last five pro bouts (non-UFC fights dashed + tagged), current trajectory, and the level of opposition going into this matchup.
Schedule Score
Who they've faced × what they've done. Composite + components compared head-to-head, percentile-ranked against every UFC fighter w/ ≥3 resolved bouts.
Per-tier records + bout-by-bout
| Tier | Charles Oliveira | Khamzat Chimaev |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | 1-3 | 2-1 |
| Top-5 | 10-7 | 1-0 |
| Top-15 | 3-1 | 1-0 |
| Cross-div champ | — | 1-0 |
| Cross-div ranked | 3-0, 1 NC | 1-0 |
| Established | 2-0 | — |
| Building | 3-0 | 1-0 |
| Unproven | 3-0 | 2-0 |
- W vs Max Holloway#490Mar 7, 2026 · Top-5
- W vs Mateusz Gamrot#876Oct 11, 2025 · Top-5
- L vs Ilia Topuria81Jun 28, 2025 · Champion
- W vs Michael Chandler#778Nov 16, 2024 · Top-5
- L vs Arman Tsarukyan#487Apr 13, 2024 · Top-5
- W vs Beneil Dariush#483Jun 10, 2023 · Top-5
- L vs Islam Makhachev#493Oct 22, 2022 · Champion
- W vs Justin Gaethje#197May 7, 2022 · Champion
- W vs Dustin Poirier#193Dec 11, 2021 · Top-5
- W vs Michael Chandler#481May 15, 2021 · Top-5
- W vs Tony Ferguson#391Dec 12, 2020 · Top-5
- W vs Kevin Lee#878Mar 14, 2020 · Top-5
- W vs Jared Gordon26Nov 16, 2019 · Established
- W vs Nik Lentz45May 18, 2019 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs David Teymur30Feb 2, 2019 · Established
- W vs Jim Miller#1474Dec 15, 2018 · Top-5
- W vs Christos Giagos15Sep 22, 2018 · Building
- W vs Clay Guida45Jun 9, 2018 · Cross-div ranked
- L vs Paul Felder59Dec 2, 2017 · Top-15
- W vs Will Brooks#1564Apr 8, 2017 · Top-15
- L vs Ricardo Lamas#485Nov 5, 2016 · Top-5
- L vs Anthony Pettis70Aug 27, 2016 · Top-5
- W vs Myles Jury58Dec 19, 2015 · Top-15
- L vs Max Holloway#592Aug 23, 2015 · Champion
- W vs Nik Lentz#972May 30, 2015 · Top-15
- W vs Jeremy Stephens#1077Dec 12, 2014 · Top-5
- W vs Hatsu Hioki12Jun 28, 2014 · Unproven
- W vs Andy Ogle8Feb 15, 2014 · Unproven
- L vs Frankie Edgar#393Jul 6, 2013 · Top-5
- L vs Cub Swanson63Sep 22, 2012 · Top-5
- W vs Jonathan Brookins18Jun 1, 2012 · Building
- W vs Eric Wisely8Jan 28, 2012 · Unproven
- L vs Donald Cerrone59Aug 14, 2011 · Top-5
- NC vs Nik Lentz40Jun 26, 2011 · Cross-div ranked
- L vs Jim Miller63Dec 11, 2010 · Top-5
- W vs Efrain Escudero18Sep 15, 2010 · Building
- W vs Darren Elkins32Aug 1, 2010 · Cross-div ranked
- L vs Sean Strickland#394May 9, 2026 · Champion
- W vs Dricus Du PlessisCHAMP100Aug 16, 2025 · Champion
- W vs Robert Whittaker#394Oct 26, 2024 · Champion
- W vs Kamaru Usman67Oct 21, 2023 · Cross-div champ
- W vs Kevin Holland45Sep 10, 2022 · Cross-div ranked
- W vs Gilbert Burns#289Apr 9, 2022 · Top-5
- W vs Li Jingliang#1167Oct 30, 2021 · Top-15
- W vs Gerald Meerschaert22Sep 19, 2020 · Building
- W vs Rhys McKee8Jul 25, 2020 · Unproven
- W vs John Phillips8Jul 15, 2020 · Unproven
All figures are 0–100 ratings (shown as %), not percentages of anything literal. Schedule strength = the average quality of every UFC opponent faced (win or lose). Win quality = the average quality of the opponents actually beaten. The composite Schedule Score combines schedule strength (65%) with win quality (35%). Per-bout opponent quality is scored on rank-at-time-of-fight (champion 100, ranks 1–5 = 90→78, ranks 6–15 = 75→60), with cross-division and P4P signals layered on, falling back to opponent UFC record-at-time for unranked opponents. For fighters with limited UFC experience the headline is held toward a rookie baseline, so debut / low-sample fighters read lower than established names. UFC ranking data is sparse before December 2018, so legacy-era fighters score from record-at-time when ranks are missing.
Career splits
Striking matchup
Each fighter's offense mapped against the other's defense — where one attacks meets where the other gets hit, across head, body, and leg. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time.
Evenly matched striking — no clear edge either way.
Where Oliveira attacks (green = high volume) vs where Chimaev gets hit (red = vulnerable) — Oliveira’s green zones meeting Chimaev’s red zones are the openings.
- Head59%51st542
- Body26%67th240
- Leg15%54th141
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share of strikes
- Head83%39th245
- Body12%72nd35
- Leg5%76th14
Color = division rank · green elite → red low · % = share absorbed · partly opponent-dependent
- Standing59%549
- Clinch17%161
- Ground23%213
- Standing90%264
- Clinch4%11
- Ground6%19
Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.
Full breakdown — all zones, both views
| Zone | Fighter | Landed / 15 | Accuracy | Absorbed / 15 | Career landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Charles Oliveira | around division average28.5 | 48% | below division average33.7 | 542 |
| Head | Khamzat Chimaev | top 19% of division40.9 | 51% | below division average35.9 | 301 |
| Body | Charles Oliveira | above division average12.2 | 69% | above division average8.9 | 240 |
| Body | Khamzat Chimaev | around division average9.2 | 56% | top 28% of division6.9 | 58 |
| Leg | Charles Oliveira | around division average7.4 | 82% | top 25% of division4.3 | 141 |
| Leg | Khamzat Chimaev | around division average6.4 | 97% | top 24% of division4.1 | 37 |
Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.
Grappling matchup
Takedowns, submission threat, and control. Per 15 minutes of UFC fight time, with takedown defense as a percentage of opponent attempts stopped.
Each metric graded on the division — the bar leans toward whoever wins that part of the grappling exchange (longer + greener = a bigger edge).
Chimaev has the grappling edge (+17).
Full breakdown — career grappling totals
| Metric | Charles Oliveira | Khamzat Chimaev |
|---|---|---|
| Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns | 2.344 | 5.335 |
| Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted | 40%44 / 111 | 58%35 / 60 |
| Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced | 52%23 / 44 | 88%7 / 8 |
| Submission attempts / 15career attempts | 2.548 | 1.49 |
| Control time / 15 (min)career total | 5.2 min99:48 | 8.5 min55:47 |
| Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total | 4.2 min80:58 | 0.6 min4:00 |
All rates computed from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Takedown defense = opponent attempts stopped ÷ opponent total attempts. Control time figures are minutes the fighter spent in a dominant position per 15 minutes of fight time. Accuracy under 8 career attempts is shown raw and ungraded — too small a sample to rate against the division.
Finishing & durability
How often each fighter ends fights early — and how often they get put away. Outcomes view, not per-minute output.
When their fights end
every pro finish on the fight clockFinish & durability rates
Full professional career
Full method breakdown
| Outcome | Charles Oliveira | Khamzat Chimaev |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | ||
| by KO / TKO | 10(27%) | 6(40%) |
| by submission | 22(59%) | 6(40%) |
| by decision | 5(14%) | 3(20%) |
| Losses | ||
| by KO / TKO | 5(45%) | 0(0%) |
| by submission | 4(36%) | 0(0%) |
| by decision | 2(18%) | 1(100%) |
Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.
KO history
UFC fights only — knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head, then when the last finish landed, and on whom.
- Last time KO'dvs Ilia Topuria11 months agoUFC 317: Topuria vs. Oliveira · Jun 28, 2025 · R1 · 2:27
- Last time submittedvs Islam Makhachev3y 8mo agoUFC 280: Oliveira vs. Makhachev · Oct 22, 2022 · R2 · 3:16
- Last time KO'dNever finished by strikes in the UFC
- Last time submittedNever submitted in the UFC
Pace & fade
How each fighter's work rate holds up as a fight wears on — round-by-round output (striking, takedown attempts, and control time combined), and whether they fade. The fade % compares round-3 output to round 1 over bouts that reached the third round.
No clear cardio edge — Oliveira holds steady (+3% per round through round 5) and Chimaev holds steady (+2% per round through round 5). Within fights that reached round 3, Oliveira sustains 97% of round-1 output by round 3, Chimaev 108%.
Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.
Full per-round breakdown — both fighters
What drives the pace · per round
The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.
| Round | Fighter | Output / min | Sig landed / min | Sig absorbed / min | TD att / min | Control | Bouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Charles Oliveira | 5.5 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 0.36 | 30% | 36 |
| R1 | Khamzat Chimaev | 9.7 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 0.69 | 86% | 10 |
| R2 | Charles Oliveira | 5.8 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 0.32 | 32% | 22 |
| R2 | Khamzat Chimaev | 5.2 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 0.33 | 32% | 5 |
| R3 | Charles Oliveira | 5.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 0.51 | 42% | 12 |
| R3 | Khamzat Chimaev | 7.8 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 0.35 | 36% | 4 |
| R4 | Charles Oliveira | 7.4 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.60 | 82% | 2 |
| R4 | Khamzat Chimaev | 8.3 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 0.70 | 53% | 2 |
| R5 | Charles Oliveira | 5.6 | 2.1 | 4.5 | 0.60 | 44% | 2 |
| R5 | Khamzat Chimaev | 8.8 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 1.30 | 44% | 2 |
Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.