Kurtis Campbell vs Trevor Peek Stats & Odds

Matchup read

Where each fighter holds an edge — offense against the opponent's defense.

Kurtis Campbell

edge

Trevor Peek

Striking

Even

Even striking exchange (thin sample)

Effective offense

B

64th

1.7

+20

A

84th

2.3

Defense

C

57th

51%

+33

F

25th

43%

KO power

C

5 KO

0.0 KD

+11

B

8 KO

0.4 KD

See full Striking →

Wrestling

◂ Campbell

Campbell has the bigger wrestling edge on Peek (thin sample)

Takedowns landed

A+

97th

5.4

+46

C

52nd

1.4

Takedown accuracy

40%

50%

Takedown defense

0%

53%

Control time

A+

85th

5.3 min

+37

C

48th

2.4 min

See full Grappling →

Submission

Even

Little submission threat either way (thin sample)

Submission attempts

F

19th

0.0

Even

F

19th

0.0

Sub win rate

B

61st

13%

1 sub

Even

C

57th

0%

0 subs

Submission defense

D

42nd

0%

Even

C

42nd

0%

See full Grappling →

Finishing

Even

Both are heavy finishers — Campbell by KO (6 of 8 wins), Peek by KO (8 of 9).

Finish rate (of wins)

75% (6/8)

89% (8/9)

By KO/TKO

5

8

By submission

1

0

Avg finish round

R1.4 avg finish

Even

R1.4 avg finish

See full Finishes →

Pace

◂ Campbell

Campbell pushes the higher work rate over the fight (thin sample)

Work rate / min — full fight

5.7

5.2

Work rate / min — rounds 1–2

5.7

Even

5.7

Pace trend—-21%/rd

See full Pace →

Form

◂ Campbell

Campbell is in better recent form than Peek (thin sample)

Win rate (career)

0%

40%

After a win—0%

Last 5

80%

40%

Win streakL1L2

See full Form →

Schedule

Even

Comparable level of opposition (thin sample)

Schedule strength

18%

14%

Win quality

32%

43%

Ranked opponents

0

Even

0

Title-holder bouts

0

Even

0

See full Schedule →

Activity

◂ Campbell

Campbell is fresher and more active than Peek

Last bout

4mo

22mo

Bouts, last 12 mo

2

0

Bouts, last 24 mo

2

1

See full Activity →

Tale of the tape

◂ Campbell

Campbell 2" reach · Campbell 7y younger · Switch-stance wrinkle

Kurtis CampbellvsTrevor Peek

24

Age

7y

younger

31

5'9"

175cm

Height

Even

5'9"

175cm

72"

183cm

Reach

2"

reach

70"

178cm

Edge sizeSlightNotableMajor

See full Tale of the tape →

Core metrics

Each fighter's career rates as a division percentile.

Kurtis CampbellTrevor Peek

Percentile

Striking/min3.504.39

Accuracy%48%53%

Defense%51%43%

Takedowns/158.81.4

TD defense%50%52%

Submissions/150.00.0

Career rate as a percentile within the featherweight (286 fighters) — further right is better. Descriptive research, not a prediction.

Pre-UFC opposition

non-UFC slate for each fighter, from opponents’ full pro records

Campbell faced the tougher slate — opponents averaged .661 career win rate vs .495 for Peek.

Kurtis Campbell

Strong

Opponents' combined record

37-19

.661 win rate

Winning-record opponents

5 of 7

carried winning pro records

Pro bouts faced

7

all opponents have records on file

A descriptive read of the non-UFC slate from opponents’ full career pro records — not a UFC-grade Schedule Score.

Trevor Peek

Moderate

Opponents' combined record

53-54-1

.495 win rate

Winning-record opponents

4 of 7

carried winning pro records

Pro bouts faced

7

all opponents have records on file

A descriptive read of the non-UFC slate from opponents’ full career pro records — not a UFC-grade Schedule Score.

Markets

UFC betting history

Career

CampbellKurtis Campbell

PeekTrevor Peek

Notes

UFC betting history is each fighter’s record when favored vs. an underdog, across their priced UFC bouts. Pick’em = closing consensus within ~2 points of even — too close to call a true favorite.

Career splits

CampbellKurtis Campbell

Stat

PeekTrevor Peek

—

1

KO / TKO

1

0

—

0

Submission

0

—

0

Decision

1

3

5:31

Avg fight time

13:00

Kurtis Campbell’s splits

vs Peek

vs Orthodox

0-0no data

vs Southpaw

0-0no data

vs Longer reach

0-0no data

Highlighted row matches this opponent’s profile — tap it to see who it counts.

Trevor Peek’s splits

vs Campbell

vs Orthodox

1-325%

vs Southpaw

0-0no data

vs Shorter reach

0-20%

Highlighted row matches this opponent’s profile — tap it to see who it counts.

Tale of the Tape

The biometric deltas where one side genuinely has an edge.

Kurtis CampbellvsTrevor Peek

24

Age

7y

younger

31

5'9"

175cm

Height

Even

5'9"

175cm

72"

183cm

Reach

2"

reach

70"

178cm

Edge sizeSlightNotableMajor

Striking matchup

Each fighter's offense against the other's defense, per 15 minutes.

UFC only

Overall Striking

Striking

C

56th

Even

C

56th

Evenly matched striking — no clear edge either way.

Each lane: the attacker’s strike rate (offense) vs the other’s rate absorbed (defense), graded on the division. The bar leans toward whoever wins the exchange — longer + greener = a bigger, higher-quality edge.

Campbell’s offensevsPeek’s defense

Head

C

56th

33.9

Even

C

51st

32.6

Body

C

55th

10.5

+14

D

41st

12.1

Leg

C

56th

8.6

+10

C

46th

8.2

Peek’s offensevsCampbell’s defense

Head

B

61st

35.2

+19

D

42nd

35.5

Body

A

74th

14.2

+33

D

42nd

11.8

Leg

C

58th

8.7

+11

C

47th

8.1

Full breakdown — all zones, both views

Zone	Fighter	Landed / 15	Accuracy	Absorbed / 15	Career landed
Head	Kurtis Campbell	above division average33.9	41%	below division average35.5	12
Head	Trevor Peek	above division average35.2	41%	around division average32.6	156
Body	Kurtis Campbell	above division average10.5	25%	below division average11.8	2
Body	Trevor Peek	top 26% of division14.2	73%	below division average12.1	71
Leg	Kurtis Campbell	above division average8.6	75%	around division average8.1	3
Leg	Trevor Peek	above division average8.7	100%	around division average8.2	38

Per-15-minute rates are sourced from UFCStats fight totals across each fighter’s UFC career. Division percentile is computed against every UFC fighter who has competed in this weight class with at least two recorded bouts. Lower “absorbed” values are better — the percentile is inverted so “top of division” always means better outcome.

Grappling matchup

Takedowns, submission threat, and control, per 15 minutes.

UFC only

Kurtis Campbell

Trevor Peek

Overall Grappling

Grappling

B

65th

+15

C

51st

Campbell has the grappling edge (+15).

Takedowns

B

69th

5.4

+16

C

54th

1.4

Takedown accuracy

40%

2/5

B

66th

50%

6/12

Takedown defense

0%

0/1

D

36th

53%

25/47

Submission threat

B

62nd

0.0

+18

C

44th

0.0

Control time

B

64th

5.3 min

+12

C

52nd

2.4 min

Full breakdown — career grappling totals

Metric	Kurtis Campbell	Trevor Peek
Takedowns landed / 15career takedowns	5.42	1.46
Takedown accuracycareer landed / attempted	40%2 / 5	50%6 / 12
Takedown defensecareer stopped / faced	0%0 / 1	53%25 / 47
Submission attempts / 15career attempts	0.00	0.00
Control time / 15 (min)career total	5.3 min1:56	2.4 min10:34
Time controlled by opponent / 15 (min)career total	2.9 min1:05	5.1 min22:05

UFCStats career rates, per 15 minutes. Takedown defense = stops ÷ attempts. Under 8 attempts shown ungraded.

Schedule Score

Opponent quality, ranked against every UFC fighter (≥3 bouts).

UFC only

Kurtis Campbell

28

Schedule Score

Trevor Peek

29

Schedule Score

UFC experienceTotal octagon time + bouts

6 min

1 bout

Octagon time

59 min

more

65 min

5 bouts

Schedule strength

18%

14%

Win quality

32%

43%

Ranked opponents

0

Even

0

Title-holder bouts

0

Even

0

Per-tier records + bout-by-bout

Per-tier records

Tier	Kurtis Campbell	Trevor Peek
Established	—	0-1
Building	0-1	0-2
Unproven	—	2-0

Kurtis Campbell — bouts

L vs Danny Silva18
Mar 21, 2026 · Building

Trevor Peek — bouts

0–100 ratings. Schedule strength = average opponent quality faced; Win quality = quality of opponents beaten. Composite = 65% schedule + 35% wins, scored on rank-at-time-of-fight.

Recent form

Last five pro bouts and recent opposition.

Kurtis Campbell

Trevor Peek

Campbell — last 5

recent → old

WFCC 41

SUB R2

Valerio

Mar ’25

WFCC 40

KO R1

Matusic

Nov ’24

WFCC 39

DEC

Lima

Sep ’24

WFCC 37

KO R1

Fletcher

Mar ’24

Peek — last 5

recent → old

Last 5 record

4-1

2-3

Current streak

L1

L2

Ranked opps

0 of 5

Even

0 of 5

Layoff

4 mo

1.9 yr

Career cohorts

Each fighter’s record by situation, over every completed UFC bout. Read down a fighter’s column; bold marks the better win rate (3+ bouts).

Kurtis Campbell

Trevor Peek

Post-result bounce

SituationCampbell Peek

After a loss

—

1-150%

After a win

—

0-20%

Camp length

SituationCampbell Peek

Typical camp100–180 days

—

1-325%

Finishing & durability

How fights end for each — finish rate and durability.

Kurtis Campbell

Trevor Peek

When their fights end

every pro finish on the fight clock

Campbell5W–1L by finish · 60% in round 1

R1

R2

R3

Peek7W–0L by finish · 86% in round 1

R1

R2

R3

0:00

5:00

10:00

15:00

Win(above)Loss(below)KO / TKOSubmissionPosition = when the fight ended

Finish & durability rates

Full professional career

Finish rate

↑14%·Peek

percent of wins ending by KO or submission

↑14%·Peek

C

54th

75%

+20

A

74th

89%

Goes the distance

Both finishers

percent of resolved bouts going to a decision (style read, not quality)

Both finishers

22%

33%

KO durability

↑11%·Peek

percent of resolved bouts ending in a KO/TKO loss

↑11%·Peek

D

31st

11%

+46

A

77th

0%

Submission defense

Even

percent of resolved bouts ending by submission loss

Even

B

65th

0%

Even

B

67th

0%

Full method breakdown

Outcome	Kurtis Campbell	Trevor Peek
Wins
by KO / TKO	5(63%)	8(89%)
by submission	1(13%)	0(0%)
by decision	2(25%)	1(11%)
Losses
by KO / TKO	1(100%)	0(0%)
by submission	0(0%)	0(0%)
by decision	0(0%)	3(100%)

Full professional career method splits, graded against the full-pro division distribution. Career KO losses are the total — clean knockouts and cut/injury stoppages can’t be separated outside the UFC corpus. Finish-time pace is UFC-only.

KO history

Knockout power and chin durability, head-to-head (UFC).

Kurtis Campbell

vs

Trevor Peek

50%

1 KO/TKO in 2 bouts

Knockout rate

33%

2 KO/TKO in 6 bouts

0

0.0 / 100 head

Knockdowns dealt

2

1.3 / 100 head

1

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

Clean KO losses

0

cuts / injury TKOs excluded

2

18.2 / 100 head

Knockdowns absorbed

0

0.0 / 100 head

Chin bars use a league scale: green = clean record, red = bottom ~10% of UFC fighters (4+ KO losses · 6+ knockdowns absorbed).

Kurtis CampbellFinish timeline

Last time KO'd
vs Danny Silva4 months ago
UFC Fight Night: Evloev vs. Murphy · Mar 21, 2026 · R2 · 0:31
Last time submitted
Never submitted in the UFC

Trevor PeekFinish timeline

Last time KO'd
Never finished by strikes in the UFC
Last time submitted
Never submitted in the UFC

Pace & fade

Round-by-round work rate, and whether they fade.

UFC only

Kurtis Campbell

—

< 2 bouts to R3

Trevor Peek

81%

R3 vs R1 · 4 bouts reaching R3

Peek drops to 81% of round-1 output by round 3 (within fights reaching round 3). Campbell hasn't reached the third round in enough UFC bouts to read a pace pattern yet.

Campbell

Peek ▼ FADESOutput / min

Faded points are drawn from a single bout that reached that round, so they’re less reliable than the solid points averaged over many fights.

Rounds backed by fewer than 2 bouts are drawn smaller and dimmed with an n= count — a deep round seen in one or two fights is a thin sample, not a settled rate. Per-round bout counts are in the breakdown below.

Full per-round breakdown — both fighters

What drives the pace · per round

The composite output line above blends these three inputs. Splitting them out shows whether a fighter’s work rate is built on striking volume, takedown pressure, or top control — and which input fades.

Sig. strikes landed

Campbell

Peeklanded / min

Takedown attempts

Campbell

Peekattempts / min

Control time

Campbell

Peek% of round

Round	Fighter	Output / min	Sig landed / min	Sig absorbed / min	TD att / min	Control	Bouts
R1	Kurtis Campbell	7.5	3.0	1.2	1.00	39%	1
R1	Trevor Peek	6.4	5.0	2.9	0.24	16%	5
R2	Kurtis Campbell	3.9	3.9	19.4	0.00	0%	1
R2	Trevor Peek	4.9	4.1	3.4	0.10	14%	4
R3	Kurtis Campbell	—	—	—	—	—	—
R3	Trevor Peek	4.2	2.9	3.9	0.20	19%	4

Output / minis the headline work rate — significant strikes landed, plus 3 per takedown attempt, plus one per 15 seconds of control — so a takedown-and-grind round isn’t scored as idle the way bare striking volume would. The remaining columns are its components. Per-round rates use UFCStats per-round data (available for ~95% of bouts since 2008). Each round’s rates are averaged only over bouts that reached that round, so the bout count shrinks as rounds deepen. The final round of a finished fight is pro-rated by its actual length — a 2:30 stoppage counts as 2.5 minutes, not five — so an early finish doesn’t distort the per-minute pace.